Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Rape/archive1

What a weird and contradictory set of opinions are beng expressed here. Of course different people have different views, but surely some sense of common understanding should be expected. There's not enough on "animal rape" and there should only be a sentence. It should be about effects and it should be about cause. It should represent a "transbiological view" (what is "transbiological" rape?). It is "full of systemic bias", but no explanation of the bias is given or any indication of how it is "systemic" (which means bias pertaining to a system: systemic bias). Is it too much to ask that contributors should hesitate before commenting, so that we can maintain a higher standard of comment. Paul B 01:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)