Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Mustafa Kemal Atatürk/archive1

While the result is correct, this is a good example of the flaws of the process. The main problem with the article at this time, as now more than three years later, is not a lack of citations, but obvious bias towards the official hagiographical version of his article. If someone who combined appropriate expertise with the article's ongoing positive bias had added citations for every statement, the article would still be totally unfit for purpose, but I worry that it might have passed this misconceived test. Luwilt (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)