Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/California State Route 78/archive1
- Just an FYI... typically most of the nitpicky stuff isn't considered grounds for an oppose right off the bat - it's usually just left as "Comments" or something like that. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Dude, calm down. Not all opposes stay, once things are fixed it can be changed. Since this is your first FAC, I understand your confusion and eagerness for supports, but right now it still has prose problems against WP:WIAFA, which all FA articles need to meet. Are the ones without replies fixed or not yet?Truco 02:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've been involved in several other WP:USRD FACs, and the norm is to leave it as "Comments" for something of the level that you wrote. Furthermore, some of your objections were unfounded. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Once again, not all opposes stay. The norm is not for that, it depends, and I thoroughly reviewed the article and found prose problems, and according to the WP:FAC objection/supporting instructions, my objection must be justifiable, and it was. So once they are fixed, I can remove it. Gosh.--Truco 03:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I know that not all opposes stay, but it's not the norm to oppose over stuff that most people would have fixed themselves as they reviewed the article. --Rschen7754 (T C) 03:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Take it to the talk page people... –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but thats not how I review.Just one comment above to be fixed and I will possibly support.--Truco 03:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Take it to the talk page people... –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I know that not all opposes stay, but it's not the norm to oppose over stuff that most people would have fixed themselves as they reviewed the article. --Rschen7754 (T C) 03:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Once again, not all opposes stay. The norm is not for that, it depends, and I thoroughly reviewed the article and found prose problems, and according to the WP:FAC objection/supporting instructions, my objection must be justifiable, and it was. So once they are fixed, I can remove it. Gosh.--Truco 03:08, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've been involved in several other WP:USRD FACs, and the norm is to leave it as "Comments" for something of the level that you wrote. Furthermore, some of your objections were unfounded. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Dude, calm down. Not all opposes stay, once things are fixed it can be changed. Since this is your first FAC, I understand your confusion and eagerness for supports, but right now it still has prose problems against WP:WIAFA, which all FA articles need to meet. Are the ones without replies fixed or not yet?Truco 02:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Just an FYI... typically most of the nitpicky stuff isn't considered grounds for an oppose right off the bat - it's usually just left as "Comments" or something like that. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)