Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories/Noticeboard
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fringe theories/Noticeboard page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This page was nominated for deletion on 6 July 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus, defaulting to keep. |
| This page was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2010. The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW keep. |
Proposed template change
[edit]I'm proposing an additional category in the Template:Editabuselinks to reduce the number of posts at WP:AN and WP:AN/I, please feel free to comment here User:Mbisanz/TemplateSandbox. MBisanz talk 13:13, 5 January 2008
I came across the page Ecoism during new page review. I am not sure what to do about it, if anything. Is it fringe, fluff or perhaps even notable. Comments please. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Main page locked, can someone post for me:
[edit]Are any of the references at Cells Alive System valid? 107.115.5.113 (talk) 05:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Borderline. I have removed three of them that support the "claim" that the freezers have attracted interest from the organ transplant field. They have not. The 3 citations were to papers discussing similar techniques, not these freezers. MarcGarver (talk) 09:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
RfC at VPP on reform of FTN and FRINGE
[edit]Wikipedia:Fringe theories has an RfC
[edit]
Wikipedia:Fringe theories has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. (Note: from continuation of ongoing discussion at Village Pump (policy).) SamuelRiv (talk) 00:34, 18 October 2024 (UTC)