Wikipedia talk:Edit warring/Archives/2014/October
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:Edit warring. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Impartialilty
Due to power given to administrators such persons should be impartial, especially when engaging in edit warring discussion. It is obvious and basic rule for almost every community, but apparently not in wiki projects, real Wild West. Whenever an administrator is engaging for the benefit of a friend, such person should almost automatically risk de-adminship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.175.152.230 (talk) 08:26, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- I think you're looking for WP:INVOLVED? A policy exists, although something as extreme as de-adminship is never automatic but is decided through process and discussion. K7L (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Protection
I would like to suggest a padlock be placed on this page. The Lightning Strikes! Try me! 23:58, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- There's no need for protection. --NeilN talk to me 12:48, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- It's already protected, but there isn't a padlock. The Lightning Strikes! Try me! 23:12, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Done - 
Thank you- MrX 23:30, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- It's already protected, but there isn't a padlock. The Lightning Strikes! Try me! 23:12, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
