Wikipedia talk:Don't assume negative notability
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Who
[edit]Wrote this drivel? The final sentence is particularly poor. 08:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC)08:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC)08:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.230.65.134 (talk)
Good Job!
[edit]Don't be discouraged by unsigned drive-by comments. You make a very good point. My first (and last) attempt at drafting an article from scratch, on the very notable cartoonist and abstract artist Kenneth Mahood foundered on the rock of another editor who I mistakenly asked to approve my article, who insisted, despite the subject having been a contributing cartoon artist for Punch for almost two decades, than for two eminent London newspapers from the 1960s to the late 1990s, and the author of over twelve published books with a list of over a dozen secondary sources attesting to his notability and achievements, that he was "not notable". Two months of work wasted by another editor who did nothing but say "no". loupgarous (talk) 02:06, 3 August 2017 (UTC)