Wikipedia talk:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 203

Nina Paley article dispute

"Closed. This is not an article content dispute. The filing unregistered editor has been ranting about this article and its subject for two years, and has been warned and blocked. The filing unregistered editor is advised that, if they want to follow dispute resolution and are willing to state their dispute civilly, they should create an account, and may request Arbitration Enforcement as a gender case. They are advised that to avoid personal attacks. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)"

"Unregistered" as if that invalidates the statement or is a slur towards a minority. I posted under the article a heading created and sponsored by multiple users noting the hiding of Nina Paley's anti transgender activity. I didn't create it. It was there before I posted. To claim that this is a "rant" when the banning was after multiple attacks on my talk page. Not on the article. And all by one user who has don't nothing but abused their power, but that wasn't what this was about in your little Stanford prison experiment,it was about the article. Of course now all I need to do now is create an account so I can give you something to take away right? Oh yes, I should want to register after what were blatantly bigoted attacks filled with misinformation. The article itself is nothing but a white wash. It's not my opinion that makes it that, it is the articles manipulation that makes it that . I am not here to reform you guards, I am here to expose you as guards. Everything in your response says emotional involvement and the enforcement of white privilege. 104.34.202.79 (talk) 07:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)