Wikipedia talk:Dead external links/404/a
correct style for editing?
[edit]Hopefully I'm editing this properly. I've been doing strikethru for fixed links and signed comments in cases where I felt like additional commentary was called for. If people can suggest better techniques let me know. — AdamDiCarlo 20:31, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
I see you did not get a response. A related comment, if the site now works with no changes, I am striking out but not making any note, if I have to take an editing action I am noting what I did. So far, most work with no changes, where I am working. Did somebody go through this section but fail to indicate they had checked these? Doubt we will ever know...... SailorfromNH 23:32, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Just a bit of info for anyone working on this page. The website www.reuters.com seems to take old news stories off the website. I have discovered this while working on these links. Grich, 14:04, 12 July 2006 (EST)
question...
[edit]I don't know where to fix these bad links, listed in this table. They are due to simple misspellings.
| bad spelling | correct alternative(s) |
|---|---|
| .../ARB_Factors_Set_1_945_1045.pdf | |
| .../ARB_Factors_Set_3_1046_1160.pdf |