Wikipedia talk:Autoreviewed

Renamed

I've renamed this working proposal to "autoreviewed" (similar to autoconfirmed, autopatrolled) rather than it usurping the old "autoreviewer" which will have many incoming links and people referring to it as such - to alleviate confusion. No prejudice to further renaming if a better title can be thought of. –xeno^talk 16:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Patroller would be better. Now that I know what you're getting at, this has nothing to do with 'reviewing' in the pending changes sense. Patrolling has been here all along. –xeno^talk 18:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC) [comments should not be taken as an endorsement of the proposal]

How about trusted? Marcus Qwertyus ^{(signs his posts)} 18:16, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

That would give the erroneous impression that everyone else is untrusted. What I don't understand is why you are spending time on this proposal when it was already pretty much rejected at the pump? As far as I know there have been no rogue patrollers, and we certainly aren't flush with patrollers such that we should go and limit it... –xeno^talk 18:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Confused

This doesn't seem at all related to "pending changes" as the lead indicates - it seems more to cover patrolling new pages using the patrol ability which is already available to every autoconfirmed user. Does this proposal seek to remove that?...or? –xeno^talk 16:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Tweaked per above. –xeno^talk 18:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)