Wikipedia talk:Article assessment/suggestions

Managing suggestions

I really think we need a method of managing suggestions and prioritizing them.

My personal favorite is a voting system (such as that used on WP:AID or WP:COTW). We're already at the point that we'll have a good-sized page if we give equal space to all suggestions (i.e. separate all the suggestions under Lots more into subheadings to ease discussion). A voting system would (a) ease the equality of the category choice process and (b) allow for discussion in a more structured, well-documented manner. Of course the downside is voting turnout might be fairly low until the project gets more exposure.
Alternatively, we could just establish a standard way of listing suggestions and commenting (likely more similar to the procedure used on WP:FA). The down-side there is suggestions added first would probably take priority over those added later.
The third option is a simple approximation of how many articles which are not stubs or FACs/FAs are in the category and a determination based on that number of how well the category fits the project. However, I think that option would be more work than it's worth for those working on the project and the same task is accomplished through the nomination process, so it's no help to the project there. --DMurphy 23:28, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This certainly needs to be addressed, but has not been my focus until the project has more participants. Thanks for the ideas - I'll have a think about them. violet/riga (t) 23:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]