Wikipedia talk:Academic peer review

Permalink

Wouldn't it be prudent to include the specific revision that was reviewed (ideally by using a permalink)? I can imagine that someone who'd put his name to a review would not want misinformation introduced later on? It also makes it easier to diff the reviewed article against any later version. dewet|✉ 16:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that means we have to make a new template. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 16:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can probably just add it in as a parameter for the existing template; the revision id is clearly visible from the permalink. Maybe the instructions to the reviewer should be to "use the permanent link" and include that URL in his review report. Then the person placing the review template can just fill in the id. dewet|✉ 16:24, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]