Noticeboard

Clerks' noticeboard (shortcut WP:AC/CN)

Clerks' Noticeboard

Arbitration Committee proceedings

Case requests

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

[edit]

Open cases

Currently, no arbitration cases are open.

[edit]

Recently closed cases (Past cases)

Case name	Closed
Yasuke	13 Nov 2024

Clarification and Amendment requests

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Arbitrator motions

No arbitrator motions are currently open.

This noticeboard's primary purpose is to to attract the attention of the clerks to a particular matter by non-clerks. Non-clerks are welcome to comment on this page in the event that the clerks appear to have missed something.

Private matters

The clerks may be contacted privately, in the event a matter could not be prudently addressed publicly (i.e., on this page), by composing an email to clerks-llists.wikimedia.org; only the clerk team and individual arbitrators have access to emails sent to that list.

Procedures

A procedural reference for clerks (and arbitrators) is located here.

Archives

1 (to 26 January 2006)
2 (to 28 January 2006)
3 (archive of a discussion started on January 29, 2006 at the incidents noticeboard)
4 (to 28 January 2006)
Old noticeboard #1 (February 2006→December 2008, clerks' coordination board)
Old noticeboard #2 (December 2008→March 2010, clerks' coordination board)
5 (January 2006→May 2009)
6 (May 2009→June 2012, noticeboard merged)
7 (June 2012→September 2014)
8 (September 2014→September 2015)
9 (3 October→4 November 2015)
10 (October 2015→March 2021)
11 (April 2021→present)

This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Arbitrators, clerks and trainees: Please coordinate your actions through the mailing list. The purpose of this page is for editors who are not clerks to request clerk assistance.

discrepancy in implementation notes in Backlash to Diversity and Inclusion

The proposed remedy contentious topic (yasuke) is logged as having no support votes, but it should be logged as having one. Apologies if this is the wrong place to put this. beepboopbwaph (talk) 15:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, fixed. SilverLocust 💬 16:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ARBPIA5 motion at ARCA

Refers to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Motion_5:_PIA5_Case.

For motion 5 (ARBPIA5) it states that there are 10 active arbs and since 1 has abstained, 5 is a majority. However, L235 (an inactive arb) has voted on it, so the majority needs to be altered to 6.

I'm unsure if that affects the numbers for any of the other motions (or indeed any other cases) but it clearly does for this one. Black Kite (talk) 20:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marked as active on the one motion. L235, we'll assume you're not active on the other 6 motions unless you indicate otherwise or vote on them. SilverLocust 💬 20:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]