Wikipedia:WikiProject Packaging

WikiProject Packaging Welcome to WikiProject Packaging. Several Wikipedians have formed this collaboration resource and group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of containers, packaging, and the organization of information and articles on this topic. This page and its subpages contain their suggestions and various resources; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians interested in the topic. If you would like to help, please join the project, inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list below. Goals The goal of this project is to ensure that all common containers, packages, processes, and technologies are included in Wikipedia and that coverage accurately reflects the subject with comprehensive, up-to-date information. All articles about packaging and containers should be illustrated with high quality images; appropriate use of galleries (WP:GALLERY) is encouraged. Scope This Wikiproject covers all common forms of containers, with an emphasis on those which are used commercially. That would include intermodal containers, packaging, bags of all kinds, boxes, buckets and pails, barrels and drums, tanks and vats, bottles, cans, etc. Related processes and packaging machinery are included. The components and materials used in packages and containers are included. Recycling, composting, and environmental considerations are part of the scope. Guidelines (To be created) Open tasks Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : * composite can Need more packaging machinery articles and pictures (non-commercial, not promotional) Star wheel Timing screw more on Flexible Barrier Materials, types, testing, use, etc Review all packaging/container articles for inappropriate advertising links. Assess : Packaging and container-related articles using {{WikiProject Containers|class=|importance=}} Cleanup : * Shipping container needs review. excess photos? Expand : Active packaging, Drug packaging, Antistatic bag, Box, Sustainable packaging, Seasonal packaging, Container glass, Aluminium bottle Maintain : Container (broad concept article), Intermodal container, overpackaging Merge : Caged IBC tote Update : , Sustainable packaging, Steel and tin cans Other : Create an Article statistics box (Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Containers articles by quality statistics) –When a task is completed, please remove it from the list. Always watch for promotional material or advertising: WP:PROMOTION.Wikipedia:Spam. This is a continuing problem. Update and improve photos is several articles Participants Please feel free to add yourself here, and to indicate any areas of particular interest. Please add new entries at the end of the list. Delicious carbuncle (talk · contribs) (Interested mainly in history of containers.) 21:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC) Horatio Snickers (talk · contribs) (Interested in glass jars and tools used for the opening of glass jars.) Horatio Snickers (talk) 18:23, 13 September 2013 (UTC) Pkgx (talk · contribs) SmokeyJoe (talk · contribs). (Interested in shipping containers converted to housing, and glass jar openings by octopi) 23:20, 17 September 2013 (UTC) Cullen328 (talk · contribs). (Interested in wine bottles, tool boxes, product packaging and especially whether this develops into a real productive project.) power~enwiki (talk · contribs) 22:49, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Articles Featured content Candidates 12 Merge discussions Review and assessment Assessment Assessment WikiProject content quality grading scheme Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example  FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate. Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Cleopatra (as of June 2018)  FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists and includes at minimum eight items; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process. Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)  A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)  GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Psychology (as of January 2024) C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow. Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Wing (as of June 2018) Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Ball (as of September 2014) Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of literary movements Quality scale Featured articles Reserved for articles that meet the featured article criteria and have received featured article status after community review Featured articles are selected at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates A-Class Reserved for articles that have received A-Class status after review by the project. Such articles are expected to largely meet the featured article criteria, and must be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and decently-written. A-Class articles are selected by the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Review#A-Class Review. Good articles Reserved for articles that meet the good article criteria and have received good article status. Good articles are selected at Wikipedia:Good article nominations. B-Class The article meets the following six criteria: It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. It is free from major grammatical errors. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. It is written from a neutral point of view Start Class Start class article have a few paragraphs that provide all the key points but may not cover all aspects of the subject. These articles usually have an image or infobox to support the text. Start-class articles are selected by individual assessors. Stub Class Stubs are very short articles which offer a quick description of the subject Stub articles are selected by individual assessors Peer review Peer review Statistics (To be created). Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Containers articles by quality statistics Assessment log November 24, 2024 Reassessed Squeeze bottle (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) November 22, 2024 Assessed Draft:Lami Packaging (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) November 20, 2024 Assessed Draft:Solidus (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) November 19, 2024 Reassessed Aluminum can (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Removed Draft:CIJCOD (talk) removed. November 18, 2024 Reassessed Aluminum can (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Categories Containers Aerosol sprays Bags Cabinets (furniture) Chests (furniture) Cigarette packaging Clothing containers Coffins Computer enclosure Cooking vessels Individual drinking vessels Container deposit legislation Dispensers Drinkware Food storage containers Fuel containers Garden vases Glass containers Granaries Holders Images of cans Liquid containers Magazines (firearms) Medicine storage containers Money containers Nested containers Pressure vessels Reliquaries Shipping containers Single-serve containers Stoneware Time capsules Urns Vases Waste containers Wine accessories Templates Project banner The project banner is used on Wikipedia talk pages to identify content under the scope of this project. {{WikiProject Packaging}} Userboxs Upon joining the project, feel free to display the project's userbox on your user page: Typing {{User WikiProject Packaging}} creates: This user is a member of WikiProject Packaging. Typing {{WikiProject Containers user box}} creates: This user is a member of WikiProject Packaging. Barnstar {{subst:The Packaging Barnstar|1=message ~~~~}} The Packaging Barnstar message ~~~~ Resources Navigation boxes Typing {{Packaging}} produces a listing of containers and expanded links in container materials, machinery, processes, etc. Typing {{Containers}} produces just the container section: Typing {{Intermodal containers}} produces: Related WikiProjects WikiProject Transport