Jump to content

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2014-06-04

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Signpost
Single-page Edition
WP:POST/1
4 June 2014

 

2014-06-04

IEG funding for women's stories: a new approach to the gender gap

Some of the participants at the Wiki WomenCamp at Buenos Aires, 2012; IEG funding may provide another type of context for addressing the wiki gender gap.
Gender Gap Workshop, Berlin 2012: Sarah Stierch (standing) is among those to whom Amanda Menking expressed gratitude in her emails to the Signpost
A session of "Bridging the gender gap" at WikiConference India 2011
Participants at the Gender Gap Strategy Day in San Francisco, 2013
Individual engagement grants (IEGs) are announced twice yearly by a volunteer WMF committee, the most recent of which we covered last December. The scheme, launched at the start of last year, awards funds to individuals or teams of up to four to produce high-impact outcomes for the WMF's online projects. It favours innovative approaches to solving critical issues in the movement.

The committee has just announced 12 fresh grants over a wide range of themes. Committee member Pine told the Signpost that in his opinion "all are good projects, and both the committee and the WMF staff exercised due diligence in managing value for money. In particular, the staff did a pretty thorough job on the audio interviews [with applicants]." This round presented a good group of grantees, he said, and in his view only one unsuccessful application was a pity, but stands a very good chance "if it returns to us with a different set of conditions".

Pine told us that while all proposals have merit, two strike him as especially interesting. One is WikiTrack, which aims to expand worldwide the scope of a facility already introduced to four Indian-language Wikipedias. This initial version has enabled users of mobile devices to track recent changes, the diffs of those changes, their watchlist, and user contributions. The facility has already proved very popular, and the new grant—with a budget of only US$2500—will bring significant technical improvements and consolidate WikiTrack for all languages on Android into a single app. Applicant Hari Prasad Nadig, on the Kannada Wikipedia, is himself a programmer and has contributed to the free and open-source software movement in India for more than a decade.

But for Pine, the standout is Women and Wikipedia, funded at just over $8000. Nothing yet has proved effective in addressing the gender gap. The new approach is to enable triangulation using both qualitative and quantitative data, so we know better where we stand in designing future interventions and technologies. The qualitative element, crucially, will include women's narratives about their wiki experiences, gathered in-person or through online modes such as skype. Methods will include interviews, small focus groups, observations of editing and mentoring events (many of them being arranged for the upcoming Wikimania in London), and an online survey, and content analysis of movement-related pages. The focus will be the English-language communities, but one goal is to form a robust basis for adaptation to other-language communities. A final report is scheduled for January 2015, and there may be related publications in academic journals.

There will be two participants: Amanda Menking, an information science PhD student at the University of Washington, Seattle, who has been guest lecturer this quarter in University classes in which she spoke about Wikipedia and systemic bias; and David McDonald, her doctoral advisor and a faculty member at the University's Information School, whose research focuses on how to make large-scale collaborative systems more effective for users. David has published "numerous papers on different aspects of Wikipedia".

The Signpost put it to Amanda Menking that it's still unclear how narrative analysis might point to strategic action to solve gender asymmetry. Might her findings help us to prioritise or contextualise strategic action? She said that although quantitative data alone tells a story, choices are always made regarding what types of data to collect/ignore, keep/trim, and how to analyze it. Wikipedians' stories of their experiences, frustrations, and motivations, as well as a careful read of how the community constructs the story of the gender gap, will help to situate and contextualise quantitative data.

We asked Amanda whether WMF plans to work toward introducting real-time talkpage exchanges between editors—instant messaging and even audio—might create a more agreeable interpersonal environment for women; or perhaps might be perceived as risky, even threatening. Will her results shed light on how to link women’s inherent preferences and fears to technological development for the communities? She said: "I would love to include questions about these kinds of design decisions and innovations", but that it is a modest research project and might be a longer-term goal.

From the perspective of large-scale collaborative systems, how different are the challenges faced by the English Wikipedia and other WMF sites in attracting and retaining female contributors compared with those faced by other such systems? David replied:

Other new IEG grants are: Reimagining Wikipedia mentorship, a "choose-your-own-adventure approach to skill learning that incorporates the 1-to-1 interactions of mentorship" ($22,600); a suite of systems to accelerate the translation and integration of medical articles into as many languages as possible ($10,000); tools for WMF Armenian-language projects (zoom into proofreading segments, easy cropping of scanned book-page images, mass parsing, and section-name monitoring) ($7600); the development of optimised online categories, including the possible use of Wikidata as a unified category system across WMF sites ($9750); a pilot program to engage digitally-literate senior citizens in editing the Czech Wikipedia (~$8000); a project to bring to fruition a pronunciation recording facility for Wiktionary ($1980); an open-access reader to deliver a complete workflow from online open resource to editor, allowing editors to access highly relevant open-access research sources ($6500); an online catalogue to make Telugu content more accessible "to Wikimedians and other open-source activists" (~$1700); Wikiquiz, an app for fun engagement with readers of the Chinese Wikipeida ($1070); and Promoting Wikivoyage, a welcome first funding for that new sister project, to promote it through local tourism bureaus (seemingly an under-ask at just $600).

Reader comments

2014-06-04

Two new affiliate-selected trustees

New trustee, Frieda Brioschi, from Italy: we face "a couple of headaches", she says: "how to boost editors, which includes the development of the next strategic plan, and how to keep our project always 'glamorous'."
Elected to a second term, Patricio Lorente from Argentina: "I’ll do my best to help the new leadership to get a balanced view of the Foundation’s scope of action and of our communities’ ideas, worries and proposals."

The Wikimedia affiliates have announced their selection of the two affiliate-selected trustees they recommend every two years to the WMF board: Frieda Brioschi from Italy and Patricio Lorente from Argentina will start their new terms from the first board meeting after 1 July. The board has determined that for the first time since this system began in 2008, not only chapters but thematic organisations should vote for whom to recommend to the board. This change did not include user groups, of which there are an increasing number. A resolution of the chapters and the one thematic organisation was passed in March, governing the conduct of the 2014 election.

Announcing the result, Chris Keating set out the mechanics. In step 1 of counting in the preferential single transferable voting system, one of the two incumbents, Patricio Lorente, won more than 50% of the vote (15.5 of 27 votes), and was declared a winner. In step 2, Anders Wennersten from Sweden was eliminated, and his second-preference votes were redistributed to the two remaining candidates; this left Frieda Brioschi with more votes than the other two incumbents, and a final total of 17 votes of 27, bringing her over the 50% mark after Alice Wiegand from Germany was eliminated in step 3. Remarkably, only 27 of the 41 eligible affiliates voted.

Frieda Brioschi was born in 1976 and by profession is a computer scientist—specifically a digital communications consultant who works on "tech projects, web strategy, community creation and management, [and] social media". She has presented three TEDx talks: two about Wikipedia, and one about lateral thinking applied to problem solving. She was a co-founder in 2005 of the Italian chapter, an administrator or bureaucrat on several Italian-language sites, and an OTRS admin.

Patricio Lorente was born in 1969 and has qualifications in philosophy and law. He has extensive professional experience in social development cooperation, particularly with NGOs, and in university management. Since 2004 he has served in the administrative management of La Plata University, the second-largest university in Argentina. His first two-year term as a chapter-selected trustee, as they were then known, is coming to an end.

In brief

Related articles
Ukraine

Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
20 March 2023

Odd bedfellows, Elon and Jimbo, reliable sources for divorces, and more
1 January 2023

Truth or consequences? A tough month for truth
31 August 2022

Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war — three (more) stories
1 August 2022

Information considered harmful
1 August 2022

War diary (part 3)
1 August 2022

WMF inks new rules on government-ordered takedowns, blasts Russian feds' censor demands, spends big bucks
26 June 2022

Editor given three-year sentence, big RfA makes news, Guy Standing takes it sitting down
26 June 2022

Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
29 May 2022

Putin, Jimbo, Musk and more
29 May 2022

Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
24 April 2022

On a war and a map
24 April 2022

Editing difficulties on Russian Wikipedia
24 April 2022

War diary (Part 2)
24 April 2022

My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
27 March 2022

War, what is it good for?
27 March 2022

The bright side of news
27 March 2022

Of safety and anonymity
27 March 2022

Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
27 March 2022

"All we are saying is, give peace a chance..."
27 March 2022

We stand in solidarity with Ukraine
27 March 2022

Working with Wikipedia helps
27 March 2022

War diary
27 March 2022

Countering Russian aggression with a camera
27 March 2022

Athletes are less notable now
27 March 2022

Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
27 March 2022

Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
26 April 2020

Ukraine burns
12 March 2014

Diary of a protester—Wikimedian perishes in Ukrainian unrest
26 February 2014


More articles

Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
20 March 2023

Odd bedfellows, Elon and Jimbo, reliable sources for divorces, and more
1 January 2023

Truth or consequences? A tough month for truth
31 August 2022

Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war — three (more) stories
1 August 2022

Information considered harmful
1 August 2022

War diary (part 3)
1 August 2022

WMF inks new rules on government-ordered takedowns, blasts Russian feds' censor demands, spends big bucks
26 June 2022

Editor given three-year sentence, big RfA makes news, Guy Standing takes it sitting down
26 June 2022

Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
29 May 2022

Putin, Jimbo, Musk and more
29 May 2022

Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
24 April 2022

On a war and a map
24 April 2022

Editing difficulties on Russian Wikipedia
24 April 2022

War diary (Part 2)
24 April 2022

My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
27 March 2022

War, what is it good for?
27 March 2022

The bright side of news
27 March 2022

Of safety and anonymity
27 March 2022

Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
27 March 2022

"All we are saying is, give peace a chance..."
27 March 2022

We stand in solidarity with Ukraine
27 March 2022

Working with Wikipedia helps
27 March 2022

War diary
27 March 2022

Countering Russian aggression with a camera
27 March 2022

Athletes are less notable now
27 March 2022

Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
27 March 2022

Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
26 April 2020

Ukraine burns
12 March 2014

Diary of a protester—Wikimedian perishes in Ukrainian unrest
26 February 2014

  • Ukraine: The Ukrainian chapter has turned five, the latest in a series of achievements for the Ukrainian wing of the Wikimedia movement—despite ongoing unrest that borders on civil war and claimed the life of Ihor Kostenko, a prominent editor. The Ukrainian Wikipedia celebrated its tenth anniversary on 30 January and crossed the 500,000 article rubicon on 12 May.
  • Beta Android app: The Wikimedia Foundation has released a beta version of its upcoming new Android app. New features include keeping track of what the user has recently viewed, an interactive table of contents, and perhaps most importantly to regular editors, the ability to edit articles directly from the app.
  • Toolserver death imminent: The Toolserver, a Wikimedia Germany-run project that has provided useful scripts to Wikimedians since 2005, will be shut down on 30 June. Its role in the movement has been taken over by Wikimedia Labs.
  • UK wants advice from Wikipedians: The UK's Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow, has started a new initiative—the Commission on Digital Democracy—so Parliament can learn how they "can use technology to better represent and engage with the electorate, make laws and hold the powerful to account." Wikimedia UK and a British think tank are spearheading a project to encourage participation from the Wikimedia community.
  • Wiki Loves Pride: The Wiki Loves Pride 2014 campaign has begun. It will run through the month of June, including a multinational edit-a-thon on or around 21 June.
  • Wikidata Game: A new game that eases editing of the Wikimedia Foundation's newest sister project, Wikidata, has taken the site by storm. According to the game's creator, as of 3 June "643 players have made an astonishing 352,710 decisions through the game, many of which result in improving Wikidata directly, or at least keep other players from having to make the same decision over again."
  • WikiConference USA: A major conference was held from 30 May to 1 June in New York City, with around 250 Wikipedians and members of the public in attendance. The first two days had scheduled sessions, while the third was in an unconference format. The German Wikipedia's Kurier described the highlights as "the view from Jake Orlowitz (Ocaasi) on the future of the Wikipedia Library, an analysis by Sara Marks (Librarygurl) on the impact of Sarah Palin interviews to the article about Paul Revere (for background see a blog post from the New York Times), a report by Kevin Gorman on serving as the first Wikipedian in Residence at an American university, as well as the presentation of journalism professor Andrew Lih (Fuzheado), in which Andrew explained how his students in a course at the American University in DC have partnered with museum and archive staff to put on edit-a-thons [and other events]." In addition, Sumana Harihareswara's opening keynote was singled out for its brilliance. Further insights are available from Wikipedia Weekly, which hosted four shows during the conference. Future US conferences are being planned on an annual basis.
Group photograph of the conference attendees


Reader comments

2014-06-04

"Hospitality, jerks, and what I learned"—the amazing keynote at WikiConference USA

Sumana Harihareswara delivered the opening keynote to WikiConference USA last week. Sumana is the current senior technical writer for the Wikimedia Foundation, as well as a member of the Ada Initiative's advisory board, and active blogger for Geek Feminism, but spoke here in her personal capacity. She's also heavily active in the broader world of free and open-source software. A full transcript of Sumana's speech is available, and versions are on Commons in both video and audio form.

Because not all Wikimedians can view these formats, I've gone ahead and uploaded both the audio and video versions of Sumana's keynote to the Internet Archive—if you can't view her speech on Commons, you should be able to view it using one of the formats the Internet Archive has transcoded the files to.

Sumana Harihareswara delivers the keynote at WikiConference USA last week
Sumana Harihareswara at the conference
Video of the presentation

I never feel quite adequate trying to paraphrase Sumana's words: she is so articulate. I highly encourage every person who reads this article to directly watch her keynote—it directly speaks to a lot of Wikimedia's most significant issues, made with great eloquence. We have a serious issue with retaining editors, and parts of her speech could serve as a pretty good partial blueprint towards how we could begin to fix that problem.

Sumana recently returned from a three-month sabbatical during which she attended Hacker School, an experimental school structured to provide a friendly, pro-actively safe environment where people work together in a collaborative environment to improve their programming skills. She applied lessons and observations she had taken from Hacker School and brought them to bear on the Wikimedia environment—with one of the most significant single points she brought up (in my mind at least), being the balance between liberty and hospitality. The difference between an environment where social norms are enforced to some extent (including through exclusion in extreme cases) and an environment where complete liberty is allowed (or to paraphrase Sumana paraphrasing of John Scalzi, "the ability to be a dick in every possible circumstance") is often perceived as a difference between an environment that excludes, and one that doesn't—but that's not the case. Quoting Sumana: "If we exclude no one explicitly, we are just excluding a lot of people implicitly."

Digressing from the direct content of her speech, there was one remarkable interchange between Sumana and an audience member that I think is worth noting—one that highlighted many of the issues she brought up in her keynote. Speaking to a photographer in the audience, she commented that she started more wildly gesticulating whenever she was being photographed, and hoped the photographer didn't object. To directly quote a snippet from the transcript:

  • Camera operator: Don't worry; I'll make you look beautiful!
  • Sumana: Make me look smart, that's more important.
  • (cheers)

Sumana's keynote touched on more issues significant to Wikimedia's community than I have space to mention here, but I highly encourage you to take a direct look at the transcript or video/audio of her speech that I linked at the beginning—I think the ideas she puts forward could represent an excellent first step towards creating a more friendly, open, inclusive Wikimedia movement.


Excerpts

  • ... to keep us from accidentally discouraging other people from doing the things they need to do to learn, at Hacker School there are four social rules ... to help everyone feel okay with failure and ignorance: no feigned surprise; no "well-actuallys"; no back-seat driving; and no sexism, racism, homophobia, and so on. Now, the user manual, which is available online, does a great job explaining all these, and I'm going to talk about the first two, because they're the most important for our context.
  • So Hacker School provided a relaxing learning community for me where I could fail safely and I had role models. It was great. I learned a lot. And then in January, when I came back to work, I felt like a fish who had taken a three-month break from the water she swims in, and wow, it was demoralizing. It is—we have demoralizing people in the Wikimedia community, and we have some demoralizing processes in places, and some of us have gotten used to it, but then there's the people who are leaving or who are thinking of leaving, or who never even come in. It's super demoralizing to be in a world where some people seem to follow the opposite of those four social rules, like those are the key tactics in how they relate to others.
  • I was able to able to articulate this to myself as the spectrum of liberty versus hospitality. The Wikimedia movement really privileges liberty, way over hospitality. And for many people in the Wikimedia movement, free speech, as John Scalzi put it, is the ability to be a dick in every possible circumstance. Criticize others in any words we like, change each other's words, and do anything that is not legally prohibited.
  • Hospitality, on the other hand, is thinking more about right speech, just speech, useful speech, and compassion. We only say and do things that help each other. The first responsibility of any citizen is to help each other achieve our goals, and make each other happy.
  • I think these two views exist on a spectrum, and we are way over to one side, and moving closer to the middle would help everyone learn better and would help us keep and grow our contributor base.
  • Valuing hospitality: another thing I'd like us to do. When someone is criticized for doing something inhospitable, the first response needs to not be: "Oh, but remember their edit count. Remember he's done X or she's done Y for this community." We need to start treating hospitality as a first-class virtue, and see that it is the seed of everything else. Alberto Brandolini said "The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it." It has a big cost when someone treats others badly. If someone is ruining the hospitality of a place by using their liberty in a certain way, we need to stop making excuses, and start on the path of exclusion. If we exclude no one explicitly, we are just excluding a lot of people implicitly. Including people like me.
The views expressed in this op-ed are those of the author only; responses and critical commentary are invited in the comments section. Editors wishing to propose their own op-ed should email the Signpost's editor in chief.

Reader comments

2014-06-04

Ye stately homes of England

David Iliff, or Diliff, as he is known on here outside the file pages for his many, many, excellent photographs, is one of Wikipedia's longest-standing professional-standard photographers. This featured picture of Waddesdon Manor is merely the latest in a long series; his first upload to Commons, this excellent photograph from back in 2005, is still a superb image. He has consistently produced gorgeous work for Wikipedia and, while he's certainly not alone in his photographic efforts for Wikipedia, the Signpost salutes him this week.
This Signpost "Featured content" report covers material promoted from 25 to 31 May.

Ten featured articles were promoted this week.

Przevalski's nuthatch as illustrated by J. G. Keulemans.
President Lyndon B. Johnson, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Rosa Parks at the signing of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
We have a lot of gorgeous architectural pictures this week. Here's another one by Diliff, of Wells Cathedral.
  • Deathrow (video game) (nominated by czar) An Xbox science-fiction sports game created by Ubisoft centred around the fictional sport of Blitz, a more-violent combination of basketball, hockey, and American football, with a Blade Runner-like design æsthetic.
  • Tadeusz Kościuszko (1746–1817) (nominated by Gwillhickers) A Polish military engineer, who managed to not only become a Polish, Lithuanian, and Belarusian military hero, but was a friend of Thomas Jefferson and assisted the Americans in the American Revolutionary War. Seriously, just read the article, it's an amazing story of someone who never saw what he saw as a just war without hurrying over to help out in it, and who, at the end of his life, tried to use his fortune to help educate and free the American slaves, although his plans were thwarted after his death.
  • Gubby Allen (1902–1989) (nominated by Sarastro1) A cricketer who captained England in eleven Test matches, later served in the administration of cricket and had a role in the subject of another recently-promoted featured article, the D'Oliveira affair. This was a complicated situation involving Basil D'Oliveira, a mixed-race South African cricketer who was playing for English teams, and the threatened cancellation of a tour of South Africa should he be included on the national English team. Calls for Allen's resignation began after it came to light that he was partially responsible for D'Oliveira's initial exclusion from the team.
  • Invisible rail (nominated by Jimfbleak) might sound like an unusual train, but it is actually a large flightless bird. Its name stems from the difficulty of finding it; a German ornithologist commented in the 1930s that "I am solidly confident no European has ever seen this rail alive, for that requires such a degree of toughening and such demands on oneself as I cannot so easily attribute to others."
  • Babe Ruth (nominated by Wehwalt ) was quite likely the greatest baseball player of all time. Starting in 1914, Ruth changed baseball to focus far more on home runs, something that endures in the present iteration of the game. Outside baseball, Ruth was a celebrity known just as much for his drinking and womanizing as for his baseball skills.
  • Voting Rights Act of 1965 (nominated by Prototime ) prohibited discrimination in voting. Designed to supplement the fourteenth and fifteenth amendments to the US constitution, the Voting Rights Act ended widespread disenfranchisement of racial minorities, particularly in the Southern region of the country. It has been championed as the most effective civil rights law ever enacted in the US.
  • Union Films (nominated by Crisco 1492) was a film production company located in the Dutch East Indies, now Indonesia. The latest in a lengthy series of Indonesian film articles from the nominator, Union Films produced seven movies before it was dissolved in 1942 as a result of a Japanese invasion and occupation. All are now considered lost.
  • Przevalski's nuthatch (nominated by Fuhghettaboutit ) is a bird endemic to parts of Tibet and China. Partly translated from the companion French Wikipedia article, Przevalski's nuthatch was only given a separate species designation from the white-cheeked nuthatch in 2005, though many bird organizations have not followed suit.
  • Empress Matilda (nominated by Hchc2009) was a claimant to the English throne during a nearly twenty-year civil war ("The Anarchy"). The nominator says that Matilda was "one of the few female war-time leaders of the medieval period", and that "even at the end of her long life she was felt to still be a powerful personality".
  • Clackline Bridge (nominated by Evad37 ) is an unusual Australian work of engineering—it carried a major highway over both a waterway and a railroad by using a curved, sloped design. Designed and constructed in the 1930s, Clackline was quickly outdated and had to be widened in 1959 and 1960, but continuing concerns about safety led to further alterations in the 1970s. The bridge was bypassed in 2007 and 2008, but it continues to see use in local road service.

Five featured lists were promoted this week.

Godot13 took this lovely photograph of the Hawksmoor Towers at All Souls College, Oxford.

Five featured pictures were promoted this week.

This stunning view of the El Atazar Dam in Spain is a new featured picture.


Reader comments

2014-06-04

Reliable or not, doctors use Wikipedia

The month of May saw significant coverage concerning the reliability of Wikipedia's medical articles. A study entitled Wikipedia vs peer-reviewed medical literature for information about the 10 most costly medical conditions (available here on the National Institute for Health's website) concluded that nine out of the ten Wikipedia articles on the costliest medical conditions have factual errors. Wikipedia's medical editors vehemently disagree. MastCell wrote: "I don't doubt that we need to improve the accuracy of our medical articles, but I agree with James that this particular study is utterly meaningless and isn't worth the electrons it's printed on."

Other editors questioned the neutrality of the The Journal of the American Osteopathy Association, with one editor asserting they have a vested interest in "trashing" Wikipedia. The Guardian noted the study, and seemed to support its findings:


Regardless of its reliability, Men's Health reported that a majority of doctors use Wikipedia at least occasionally, and suggested the websites of the Center for Disease Control and the United States Department of Health and Human Services as alternative sources.

In brief

  • Wales calls EU ruling "astonishing": BBC News covered Jimmy Wales' comments about a recent EU decision against Google in which it guaranteed a right to privacy. Wales said, in part "If you really dig into it, it doesn't make a lot of sense. They're asking Google... you can complain about something and just say it's irrelevant, and Google has to make some kind of a determination about that."
  • Is Wikipedia a reliable legal authority?: Above the Law examined Wikipedia's status as a legal source, noting its frequent citation in court cases (see Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a court source).
  • Issues with Google caching libelous versions of Wikipedia: Two incidents underscored issues that ensue when Google caches libelous versions of Wikipedia pages.
  • Bad Wikipedia pictures: TheWire.com reviewed some of the less flattering Wikipedia pictures that presently manifest themselves in articles.
  • Civil servants behind "sickening" Hillsborough slurs identified: The Telegraph reported that an internal investigation has identified individuals responsible for "sickening" slurs posted on soccer articles.
  • Wikipedia is a masterclass in digital democracy: Wired.com reports how Wikipedia is a good example of how democracy can exist on the internet. This is due to the fact that everyone is allowed to contribute to the site, as well as recognize those who do exceptional work.
  • "Love and drama at the Wikipedia Conference": New York Magazine sent a reporter to cover last weekend's WikiConference USA. After a candid discussion with multiple editors, two editors were chosen to be a part of the article and made up most of the interviews within it. Frank Schulenburg was also profiled, and included towards the end of the article. The piece was not without controversy, though—Wikimedians on the Wikimedia-l mailing list were disheartened to see the conference represented in such a light, including the liberal editing of the quotes of two of the editors to change the essence of what they said.

    Reader comments

2014-06-04

Autumn in summer

The northern summer is a time when one is meant to celebrate the exuberance of life; instead, commemoration of the dead was a significant theme this week, as the top three slots were taken up by the beloved poet Maya Angelou, dead this week at 86, environmentalist pioneer Rachel Carson, and Memorial Day, the US holiday for commemorating its war dead. Even Mark Twain's eerie prediction of his own death, in which he hoped to go out with Halley's Comet, got onto the list thanks to Reddit. Other than that, the usual dose of Game of Thrones; a show very familiar with death.

For the full top 25 list, see WP:TOP25. See this section for an explanation for any exclusions.

For the week of 25 to 31 May, the 10 most popular articles on Wikipedia, as determined from the report of the 5,000 most viewed pages, were:

Rank Article Class Views Image Notes
1 Maya Angelou Featured Article 1,227,753 One of America's most popular contemporary writers, Maya Angelou died this week at the age of 86. Since delivering a recitation at Bill Clinton's inauguration (the first poet to give an inaugural recitation since Robert Frost) she became an intellectual celebrity across all boundaries.
2 Rachel Carson Featured Article 876,502
The marine biologist and conservationist whose 1962 book Silent Spring became a founding text of the environmental movement and led to the abolition of DDT as a pesticide got a Google Doodle on her would-have-been 107th birthday on 27 May.
3 Memorial Day C-Class 765,063
The last Monday in May (that's May 26 this year), the day that the United States chose to honour its war dead, is perhaps better known as the traditional beginning of US summer vacation, and is thus eagerly anticipated by millions of people too young to serve but old enough to stand in line for action movies.
4 Game of Thrones (season 4) C-Class 712,695
This is the page with the plot synopses for each episode.
5 Halley's Comet Featured Article 706,568
I came in with Halley's comet in 1835. It is coming again next year, and I expect to go out with it. It will be the greatest disappointment of my life if I don't go out with Halley's comet. The Almighty has said, no doubt: "Now here are these two unaccountable freaks; they came in together, they must go out together." So said Mark Twain in his autobiography in 1909, and it turned out he was right. He died the day after the comet's 1910 perihelion. This curious fact managed to spawn a Reddit thread this week (the original poster wondered, I hope jokingly, if the fact that he was born when Halley returned in 1986 meant he was a reincarnation of Mark Twain – respondents were lukewarm to the notion).
6 Amazon.com B-Class 701,370
This article suddenly reappeared in the top 25 a few months ago after a long absence; it's always difficult to determine the reasons for the popularity of website articles (how many are simply missed clicks on the Google search list?) but there are a number of possibilities: first, it released its digital media player, Amazon Fire TV on April 2, and second, it is currently embroiled in a dispute with publisher Hachette, a spat with potentially world-shaking implications as to whether book publishers even need to exist in the post-digital world.
7 List of Game of Thrones episodes List 642,862
The episode list is probably used to look up air dates.
8 Game of Thrones B-class 587,030
New seasons of this immensely popular show always draw people to Wikipedia.
9 X-Men (film series) Good Article 559,739
X-Men: Days of Future Past, Bryan Singer's cross-generational collaboration uniting his original cast of fogies with their younger selves introduced in X-Men: First Class, earned $90 million in its first weekend, but seems not to be generating the fire of other Marvel Comics franchises. Still, it appears to have triggered interest online.
10 Watch Dogs C-class 519,597 The third-person adventure game in which hacking is a significant game mechanic has been hyped to the roof as the showcase for the eighth generation of video game consoles. Well, it worked; the game has sold 4 million copies in its first week.


Reader comments
If articles have been updated, you may need to refresh the single-page edition.