Jump to content

Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of Oklahoma/Women and Medicine (Fall)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Women and Medicine
Institution
University of Oklahoma
Instructor
Kathleen Crowther
Wikipedia Expert
Sage (Wiki Ed)
Subject
history of women in medicine
Course dates
2017-08-21 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-12-20 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
54


This course surveys the relationship between women and medicine from Antiquity to the present. We will examine the interrelated histories of women as medical practitioners, patients and objects of medical knowledge. We explore the different ways women functioned as health care providers, as domestic healers, nurses, midwives, and physicians. At the same time, we discuss how women experienced illness in the past and the expectations and norms that shaped their illness experiences. Finally, we look at medical knowledge about women and how ideas about gender have been constructed by the medical professions.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Jamaljerbassue Emma Louise Call, Elizabeth D. A. Cohen, Hildegard of Bingen
Caitlinbeasley
Daelyinh Julie Campbell (vascular biologist) Josephine Gabler, Alice Woodby McKane, Lillie Rosa Minoka Hill
KatieEgger Catharine Macfarlane Camilla Erculiani, Lucy Hobbs Taylor, Clara Brawner
Catherine.lewis Lillias Hamilton
Emilymadams Janet Asimov
PHUONGNGUYEN 09 Alice Woodby McKane Helen Chambers, Clara Brawner
MeganV96 Linda Aranaydo, Honoria Somerville Keer, Jennifer Elisseeff, Anna Fischer-Dückelmann
Tmilligan24 Virginia M. Alexander Dorothea of Mansfeld, Uinyeo
Tristencollins Emily Bacon Women in medicine, Thelma Alper
Anniejordan22 Mary Hobart
KKluber Margaret Allen Lucy Hobbs Taylor, Charlotte Denman Lozier
Shannon.spillers Johanna Saint John
Shannongidley Leila Andrews
Jakeboone1 Maragaret Kennix
TaylorAnne Ruth Barnett
Morgang331 Joan Hodgman, Women in medicine Women in medicine
ErIn5 Clara Brawner Catharine Macfarlane
Celynnebeaudoin Marie Colinet
Simrandemla Esther Chapa
Emilybru Sarah Hackett Stevenson
Tiktakthuc Thelma Alper Johanna Saint John, Julie Campbell (vascular biologist)
Kaegansmith Abella
Magarrett18 Josephine Gabler
CJars Camilla Erculiani
AbbyEvans Clemence Sophia Harned Lozier
Laurenmeans Charlotte Denman Lozier
Parrishbridget1 Eva Shaver
Desireelagunas Nita Barrow Alice Ball, Dorothea of Mansfeld
Bart0000 Helen Chambers Article evaluation
MakaylaFoster Maud Forrester-Brown Ruth Barnett, Alice Woodby McKane
Slook20 Adelle of the Saracens
Zinn6312 Elizabeth Freke
Heathermcdaniel Loretta Alvarez
ToyStoryAndy Lucy Hobbs Taylor Catharine Macfarlane, Margaret Allen
Haleyrader1 Madame Restell
Siesmith Dorothea of Mansfeld Alice Ball, Emma Louise Call, Virginia M. Alexander, Uinyeo
Hawk5002 Sybil Katherine Gotto, Sybil Neville-Rolfe Women in medicine, Dorothea of Mansfield, Dorothy Hansine Andersen
MaganWurth13 Margaret Dick
Imrosapark Uinyeo Dorothea of Mansfeld, Virginia M. Alexander, Alice Ball
Minamakvandi Dorothy Hansine Andersen
Tobidipeolu Yvonne Sylvain Thelma Alper, Rebecca de Guarna
Mrugapatel Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Billynorlin Neurosurgery Julie Campbell (vascular biologist), Emily Bacon
Pfrattone Hannah Billig
Christinethomas
E.prusha Psyche Cattell Margaret Allen, Joan Hodgman
Yzzysmith Alice Ball Nita Barrow, Dorothea of Mansfeld
Eyab3511 Constance Calenda
Thom4838 Matilde Rodríguez Cabo Matilde Rodríguez Cabo
Worldshope101 Annie Aghnaqa (Akeya) Alowa
Nicole5826 Magistra Hersend
Jackieareal Kazue Togasaki
Mallorytucker Selma Dritz
Kirk0134 Frieda Nugel
Khpoarch Mamie Cadden
Kristacook96 Agnodice
Beth.autumnnn Catherine Kaidyee Blaikley

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Tuesday, 5 September 2017   |   Thursday, 7 September 2017
In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:


Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.)
  • It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
  • When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

Course meetings
Tuesday, 12 September 2017   |   Thursday, 14 September 2017
Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings.
  • Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    • Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  • Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~~~~.

Week 3

Course meetings
Tuesday, 19 September 2017   |   Thursday, 21 September 2017
Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  • The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.

Week 4

Course meetings
Tuesday, 26 September 2017   |   Thursday, 28 September 2017
In class - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?

Week 5

Course meetings
Tuesday, 3 October 2017   |   Thursday, 5 October 2017
Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.

  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  • Find an article from the list of "Available Articles" on the Articles tab on this course page. When you find the one you want to work on, click Select to assign it to yourself.
  • In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
    • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page.
    • Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.

Week 6

Course meetings
Tuesday, 10 October 2017   |   Thursday, 12 October 2017
In class - Discussion
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?


Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
    • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

  • Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.



Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 7

Course meetings
Tuesday, 31 October 2017   |   Thursday, 2 November 2017
Assignment - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Content Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.

Week 8

Course meetings
Tuesday, 7 November 2017   |   Thursday, 9 November 2017
Assignment - Peer review and copy edit
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  • Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign them to yourself to review.
  • Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
  • As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 9

Course meetings
Tuesday, 14 November 2017   |   Thursday, 16 November 2017
Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  • Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Content Expert if you have any questions.


Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
  • Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' or 'Edit source' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.

Creating a new article?

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
  • You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.


Assignment - Did You Know
  • Optional: For new articles or qualifying expansions of stubs, compose a one-sentence “hook,” nominate it for “Did you know,” (see the DYK instructions handout) and monitor the nomination for any issues identified by other editors. Wiki Education staff can provide support for this process.



Handout: "Did You Know" submissions

Week 10

Course meetings
Tuesday, 21 November 2017
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
  • Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take the 'Contributing Images and Media Files' training before you upload an image.


Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Content Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 11

Course meetings
Tuesday, 28 November 2017   |   Thursday, 30 November 2017
Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Content Expert at any time!
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.