Jump to content

Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Stanford Law School/Advanced Legal Research (Spring 2018)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Advanced Legal Research
Institution
Stanford Law School
Instructor
Beth Williams
Wikipedia Expert
Shalor (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Legal Research
Course dates
2018-04-02 00:00:00 UTC – 2018-06-08 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
25


The ALR Wikipedia article assignment is intended to provide students with an opportunity to edit or create an article on a legal topic. Students will provide substantive research and analysis, written for a general audience. The goal is to provide a meaningful public service while exploring information assessment, reliability and accessibility of the law and legal literature.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Jry96 Police v. City of Newark
Yingpun Wong Wing v. United States
Slsnw12 Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Smw19 Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S. 452 (2011)
Ahavriliak Bell v. Wolfish Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, Martin Act
Fareslols Totten v. United States
Alel19 Zurcher v. Stanford Daily Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo, AB 1066: Phase-In Overtime for Agricultural Workers Act of 2016
Rsuhr Burks v. United States
Bsilverkorn Biometric Information Privacy Act
Lauren2592 Alien Tort Statute
MirandaESM Almeida-Sanchez v. United States
Lph44 Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.
Sbirndorf The Equal Pay Act of 1963
Plw2018 Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth
Imj369 Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.
Mpschnei Brown v. Plata
Raneil13 Qualified immunity
Vanessgu AB 1066: Phase-In Overtime for Agricultural Workers Act of 2016 Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
Monfredo Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York Bell v. Walfish, Wong Wing v. United States
Bluebook-enthusiast State v. Abbott Wong Wing v. United States, Almeida-Sanchez v. United States
Jaronsohn Martin Act
Kmsls
P m c 1 2 3 4 5 Bartnicki v. Vopper
Sls380 Abandoned Barge Act of 1992
Jkatterh McCullen v. Coakley
Ksott.student
Bwillhh Bankruptcy Act of 1938
Kmer2018 Budget Enforcement Act of 1990
Dspopkin Califano v. Goldfarb

Timeline

Week 2

Course meetings
Monday, 9 April 2018   |   Wednesday, 11 April 2018
In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:


Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.)
  • It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
  • When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 3

Course meetings
Monday, 16 April 2018   |   Wednesday, 18 April 2018
Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings.
  • Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    • Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  • Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~~~~.
Milestones

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?


Assignment - Add to an article training

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  • The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.


Assignment - Sign up for in-class presentations

Sign up for a time slot on either Wednesday, May 23 or Wednesday, May 30 to provide a short presentation of your experience and your article. You may not have fully completed your article when you present. 

Week 4

Course meetings
Monday, 23 April 2018   |   Wednesday, 25 April 2018
Milestones
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?


Assignment - Choose possible topics
  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  •  Look up potential topics related to the course that you might want to update on Wikipedia. You are welcome to limit your search to the suggested topics posted on our Canvas page here
  •  Choose potential articles that you can tackle, and post links to the articles and your notes about what you might improve in your sandbox
  • Finally, make your article topic selection. You are not required to seek advance approval for your topic.  However, we are available for consult at any point as you weigh your options; please don't hesitate to reach out if you'd like to discuss. 

Week 5

Course meetings
Monday, 30 April 2018   |   Wednesday, 2 May 2018
Assignment - Finalize your topic / Find your sources
  • On the Students tab, assign your chosen topic to yourself.
  • In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
    • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page, too.
    • Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.


Guide(s) for writing articles in your topic area

Biographies

Books

History

Political Science


Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
    • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

  • Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.



Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 6

Course meetings
Monday, 7 May 2018   |   Wednesday, 9 May 2018
Milestones
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?


Assignment - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.


Assignment - Optional
Peer review and copy edit
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  •  Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign them to yourself to review. 
  •  Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! However, please note that you ARE NOT required to make the edits suggested (especially since some editors could be from outside the class). A mere acknowledgment of any classmate's suggestions may suffice.  
  •  As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic? 
  • NB. This peer review assignment has been removed from the Wikipedia article grading scheme (on Canvas). However, those who choose to complete this exercise will receive supplemental points toward the final course grade. 
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.


Assignment - Optional
Respond to your peer review (see above)

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  • Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions.

Week 7

Course meetings
Monday, 14 May 2018   |   Wednesday, 16 May 2018
Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
  • Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.

Creating a new article?


Assignment - Begin preparing for in-class presentation
  • Prepare for an in-class presentation about your Wikipedia editing experience.

Week 8

Course meetings
Monday, 21 May 2018   |   Wednesday, 23 May 2018
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
  • Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image.


Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!


Assignment - Continue preparing for in-class presentation
  • Prepare for an in-class presentation about your Wikipedia editing experience.


In class - In-class presentations - 5/23

Present about your Wikipedia editing experience.


Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:


  • Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions (if applicable)? 
  • Peer Review: Consider including information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article? 
  • Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback? 
  • Wikipedia generally: How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of the law/your topic? Comment on whether you think this kind of contribution adds meaningful value for the public and/or for law students, lawyers, judges and clients.  

Week 9

Course meetings
Wednesday, 30 May 2018
In class - In-class presentations - 5/30

Present about your Wikipedia editing experience.


Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:


  • Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions (if applicable)? 
  • Peer Review: Consider including information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article? 
  • Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback? 
  • Wikipedia generally: How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of the law/your topic? Comment on whether you think this kind of contribution adds meaningful value for the public and/or for law students, lawyers, judges and clients.  


Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.