Jump to content

Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Sam Houston State University/Advanced Composition (Fall 2017)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Advanced Composition
Institution
Sam Houston State University
Instructor
Ching-In Chen
Wikipedia Expert
Shalor (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Creative Nonfiction
Course dates
2017-08-23 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-12-06 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
6


In project-oriented teams, you will first research a (relatively) well-known author and essay, selected for publication in John D’Agata’s 'The Next American Essay,' which has become a core text for many contemporary creative nonfiction workshops. As a team, you will create a presentation. The presentation should cover 1) the importance of this essay and author as a creative nonfiction author; 2) the author’s presence in Wikipedia and other forms of public reference resources and 3) a Writing Experiment prompt based on the structure of the author’s NAE essay which would be helpful to emerging creative nonfiction writers to try.

Your team will then contribute a well-researched article on an emerging creative nonfiction writer to be added to or developed on Wikipedia that serves as a current reference resource for Wikipedia readers, which includes publications, awards, and other key information. In addition, students will write a short written reflection as part of their process letter, which will focus on their understanding of their role as a literary citizen. In addition to my assessment, you will assess your work and participation in the team as well as the work and participation of your team members.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Cms141 Aisha Sabatini Sloan, Samantha Irby
Jnt018 Vanessa Martir
Lvh001 Vanessa Mártir
Breannasade Samantha Irby

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Monday, 30 October 2017   |   Tuesday, 31 October 2017   |   Wednesday, 1 November 2017   |   Thursday, 2 November 2017   |   Friday, 3 November 2017
Assignment - Introduction to the Wikipedia project (On Your Own)

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. 


This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia. 


 Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page. 


 To get started, please review the following handouts: 



Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia (On Your Own)
  •  Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you.
  •  It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade. 
  •  When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page. 
Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 2

Course meetings
Monday, 6 November 2017   |   Tuesday, 7 November 2017   |   Wednesday, 8 November 2017   |   Thursday, 9 November 2017   |   Friday, 10 November 2017
Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia (On Your Own)

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.


  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings. Please leave at least three notes, minimum 75 words total.
  • Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    • Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  • Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Lucky Snake (talk) 02:38, 4 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]


Assignment - Discussion
What's a content gap? (On Your Own)

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions. Please post a response to one of the questions on Blackboard, which must be a minimum of 150 words in length and include a substantive contribution of your own. Please post the word count at the end of your post.


  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?


Best practices for working in groups
  • Once your group has a Wikipedia article to work on, make sure everyone in the group is assigned to that article on the Students tab of this course page.
  • Select one group member whose Sandbox space you'll all share to draft your article. (It will be titled something like User:Diderot/sandbox.) Each person should link to that shared Sandbox from their own Sandbox page. A sandbox is like any other page on Wikipedia, and anyone can edit it.
  • Wikipedia doesn't handle multiple people editing from different devices at the same time very well. If you're working together in person, one person should add the work to the Sandbox. If you are all working independently, make small edits and save often to avoid "editing conflicts" with classmates. Make sure that you're logged in under your own Wikipedia account while editing in your classmate's sandbox to ensure your edits are recorded.
  • Don't create a group account for your project. Group accounts are prohibited.

Week 3

Course meetings
Monday, 13 November 2017   |   Tuesday, 14 November 2017   |   Wednesday, 15 November 2017   |   Thursday, 16 November 2017   |   Friday, 17 November 2017
Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources (With Your Team)

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.


  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  •  Find an article from the list of "Available Articles" on the Articles tab on this course page. When you find the one you want to work on, click Select to assign it to yourself. 
  •  In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
  • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page.
  • Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography. 


Assignment - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism (On Your Own)

Please post a response to one of the questions on Blackboard, which must be a minimum of 150 words in length and include a substantive contribution of your own. Please post the word count at the end of your post. 

  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?


Guide(s) for writing articles in your topic area



Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 4

Course meetings
Monday, 20 November 2017   |   Tuesday, 21 November 2017
Assignment - Draft your article (With Your Team)

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.


  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox. 
  • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.
  • Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Week 5

Course meetings
Monday, 27 November 2017   |   Tuesday, 28 November 2017   |   Wednesday, 29 November 2017   |   Thursday, 30 November 2017   |   Friday, 1 December 2017
Assignment - Peer review and copy edit (On Your Own)
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  •  Select one article written by a classmate not on your team that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the article that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign it to yourself to review. 
  •  Peer review your classmate's draft by making at least two comments, with a total of 75 words. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians. 
  •  As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic? 


Assignment - Respond to Peer Review (With Your Team)

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!


  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  •  Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions. 
  • Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.
  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
  • Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image.
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 6

Course meetings
Monday, 4 December 2017   |   Tuesday, 5 December 2017   |   Wednesday, 6 December 2017
Assignment - Did You Know (Extra Credit)
  • Optional: For new articles or qualifying expansions of stubs, compose a one-sentence “hook,” nominate it for “Did you know,” (see the DYK instructions handout) and monitor the nomination for any issues identified by other editors. Wiki Education staff can provide support for this process.


Handout: "Did You Know" submissions


Assignment - Move your work to Wikipedia (With Your Team)

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace." 



  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
  • You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.
  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!


Assignment - Reflection & Assessment

As part of your longer process letter on your writing this semester, include a minimum of 300 words on the process of creating your Wikipedia contributions and how it connects to the idea of being a literary citizen.


Some questions to consider as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:


  • Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article? 
  • Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions? 
  • Peer Review: What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article? 
  • Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback? 
  • Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important? 

In addition to my assessment, you will assess your work and participation in the team as well as the work and participation of your team members. Please complete the individual and team assessments on Blackboard by Wednesday, December 6.

Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Sam_Houston_State_University/Advanced_Composition_(Fall_2017)&oldid=813563424"