Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/SUNY Plattsburgh/Investigative Biology Experience, Bio 490 (Spring)
| This Course
|
Wikipedia Resources
|
Connect
Questions? Ask us:
contact |
 | This course page is an automatically-updated version of the main course page at dashboard.wikiedu.org. Please do not edit this page directly; any changes will be overwritten the next time the main course page gets updated. |
- Course name
- Investigative Biology Experience, Bio 490
- Institution
- SUNY Plattsburgh
- Instructor
- Joel Parker
- Wikipedia Expert
- Ian (Wiki Ed)
- Subject
- Biology
- Course dates
- 2018-01-29 00:00:00 UTC – 2018-05-18 23:59:59 UTC
- Approximate number of student editors
- 11
BIO490 is a full semester research course covering aspects of cellular and molecular biology. The focus of the course will highlight the research interests of the participating faculty. Skills, techniques and instrumentation required for the semester's research are introduced and covered. This 12 credit course requires student teams to make progress on specific research projects. Instruction includes attendance at a regional or national scientific meeting. The course can substitute for Communicating Biology (AWR) and Cell biology with Lab.
Timeline
Week 1
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 29 January 2018 | Tuesday, 30 January 2018 | Wednesday, 31 January 2018 | Thursday, 1 February 2018 | Friday, 2 February 2018
- In class - Orientation, nothing to do on Wikipedia
Week 2
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 5 February 2018 | Tuesday, 6 February 2018 | Wednesday, 7 February 2018 | Thursday, 8 February 2018 | Friday, 9 February 2018
- Assignment starts next week
Week 3
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 12 February 2018 | Tuesday, 13 February 2018 | Wednesday, 14 February 2018 | Thursday, 15 February 2018 | Friday, 16 February 2018
- In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project
Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.
This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.
Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.
To get started, please review the following handouts:
- Editing Wikipedia pages 1–5
- Evaluating Wikipedia
- Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia
- Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. When picking a user name remember that everything on Wikipedia is public and pick your user name accordingly.
- It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
- When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
- Assignment - Everyone has a Wikipedia account
This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account and completed the first 4 training sessions. 5 for enroling correctly, 4 for the trianing modules.
Week 4
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 19 February 2018 | Tuesday, 20 February 2018 | Wednesday, 21 February 2018 | Thursday, 22 February 2018 | Friday, 23 February 2018
- In class - Evaluate Wikipedia
It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.
- Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
- Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings.
- Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
- Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~~~~.
- In class - Discussion
- What's a content gap?
Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.
- Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
- What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
- Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
- What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?
- Assignment - The article evaluation should be posted in your sandbox.
5 points for the evaluation based on your application of the criteria above, plus 1 for the training module.
Week 5
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 26 February 2018 | Tuesday, 27 February 2018 | Wednesday, 28 February 2018 | Thursday, 1 March 2018 | Friday, 2 March 2018
- In class - Discussion
- Thinking about sources and plagiarism
- Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
- What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
- What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
- What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?
- Assignment - Review the rules for medical topics
Review Wikipedia's rules for topics related to medicine, human health, and psychology.
- Assignment - Choose possible topics
- Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
- Look up 3-5 potential topics related to the course that you might want to update on Wikipedia. Review the content of the article and check the Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Identify one or two areas from each that you could improve. Good places to look for topics for this class are cell biology stubs, Genetics stubs, and molecular biology stubs, and biochemistry stubs.
- Choose 2-3 potential articles from that list that you can tackle, and post links to the articles and your notes about what you might improve in your sandbox.
- Finally, present your choices to your instructor for feedback.
- Assignment - Add to an article
Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:
- Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
- TheCitation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.
5 points for the usefulness/correct type of addition plus 3 points for the 3 new training modules (should have had plagiarism before).
Week 6
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 5 March 2018 | Tuesday, 6 March 2018 | Wednesday, 7 March 2018 | Thursday, 8 March 2018 | Friday, 9 March 2018
- Assignment - Finalize your topic / Find your sources
- On the Students tab, assign your chosen topic to yourself. (5 points)
- In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article. (5 points)
- Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page, too.
- Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliograph
- Assignment - Draft your article
You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.
Creating a new article?
- Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
- A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.
Improving an existing article?
- Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.
Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.
Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9
Week 7
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 12 March 2018 | Tuesday, 13 March 2018 | Wednesday, 14 March 2018 | Thursday, 15 March 2018 | Friday, 16 March 2018
- In class - Spring Break, continue working on your draft
Week 8
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 19 March 2018 | Tuesday, 20 March 2018 | Wednesday, 21 March 2018 | Thursday, 22 March 2018 | Friday, 23 March 2018
- In class - Discussion
- Thinking about Wikipedia
- What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
- What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
- On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
- If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?
- Expand your draft
- Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
- If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.
Week 9
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 26 March 2018 | Tuesday, 27 March 2018 | Wednesday, 28 March 2018 | Thursday, 29 March 2018 | Friday, 30 March 2018
- Assignment - Completed first draft in Sandbox
First drafts in your sandbox for instructor grading/ feedback.
- Assignment - Peer review and copy edit
- First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
- Select one group members article that you will peer review and copy edit and the other that you will fact check.
- On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review, and then assign them to yourself in the Review column.
- Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
- As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?
Week 10
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 2 April 2018 | Tuesday, 3 April 2018 | Wednesday, 4 April 2018 | Thursday, 5 April 2018 | Friday, 6 April 2018
- Assignment - Peer reviews are complete
Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles (review each of you lab partnters articles).
5 points for each of your reviews of your lab mates articles, plus 1 for the training module (11 total)
Week 11
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 9 April 2018 | Tuesday, 10 April 2018 | Wednesday, 11 April 2018 | Thursday, 12 April 2018 | Friday, 13 April 2018
- Philadelphia meeting!!!!
Week 12
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 16 April 2018 | Tuesday, 17 April 2018 | Wednesday, 18 April 2018 | Thursday, 19 April 2018 | Friday, 20 April 2018
- Assignment - Respond to your peer review
You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!
- Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
- Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions.
- 5 points for a paragraph in your sandbox saying how you will respond to all of your peer review (lab mates, instructors and anyone else).
Week 13
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 23 April 2018 | Tuesday, 24 April 2018 | Wednesday, 25 April 2018 | Thursday, 26 April 2018 | Friday, 27 April 2018
- Assignment - Move your work to Wikipedia
Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace." 5 points for getting it done by the due date.
Editing an existing article?
- NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
- Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
- Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.
Creating a new article?
- Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
- You can also review the Sandboxes and Mainspace online training.
Week 14
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 30 April 2018 | Tuesday, 1 May 2018 | Wednesday, 2 May 2018 | Thursday, 3 May 2018 | Friday, 4 May 2018
- Assignment - Continue improving your article
Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.
- Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
- Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image.
- Polish your work
Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!
Week 15
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 7 May 2018 | Tuesday, 8 May 2018 | Wednesday, 9 May 2018 | Thursday, 10 May 2018 | Friday, 11 May 2018
- Milestones
It's the final week to develop your article.
- Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
- Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!
- Milestones
Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.
40 points for the final version plus 1 point for the media traiing module.