Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Sonic and the Secret Rings/Archive1
Appearance
I want to pursue FAC eventually with this article. Any comments are good. Tezero (talk) 23:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- I see a dead link in the External Links section. The link is this. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- That link's ok, but I removed a couple dead ones. Thanks for alerting. Tezero (talk) 03:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Everything looks pretty good to me. I guess the only comment I have is regarding formatting of the references. Some of the citations could stand to be expanding, such as those from IGN where the authors and dates may exist (citation 22, 40). Others from the instruction booklet and magazines such as Nintendo Power and EGM are missing publisher information. ~ Hibana (talk) 22:59, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Comments by Teancum
- In the sentence "Nintendo Power's Chris Shepperd, and GameSpot's Greg Mueller called the game the best 3D Sonic game, although criticizing 3D Sonic games in general" the references following are out of order.
- Done. Tezero (talk) 21:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- The Wiimote picture seems superfluous. It has no true purpose in the article. Even though it's free it just doesn't have a lot of weight. --Teancum (talk) 16:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- I added it for context about how exactly it's supposed to be held for this game. I guess it was kind of superflous, though. I removed it. Tezero (talk) 21:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Note: Requested copyedit at WT:VG. Tezero (talk) 05:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- Copyedit done, and the copyeditor seemed to think the article was good quality. This article is at FAC now, making this peer review obsolete. Tezero (talk) 14:10, 11 June 2010 (UTC)