Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/NHL 11
Appearance
I would like some assistance in bringing the prose up to snuff. HeyMid (contributions) 22:22, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Comments by Teancum
I've done some preliminary copy edits/wikifying, but glancing over it after the reorganization I see a few things:
- The modes section can be expanded. An overview of what modes are available would help, and if the text for the two modes doesn't need to be any longer you can lump everything into one paragraph -- that being said, if it's only one paragraph it doesn't need a section. 2-3 paragraphs might merit one, though.
- The "Leagues and teams" section has some citation needed tags which need to be addressed. Also, I don't know if there's any way to avoid this, but there's just a sea of blue text in this section, making it hard to read.
- In the "Development and marketing" section - "On May 3, 2010, an FAQ was released" should be "a FAQ"
- This section could also use some info on the game's announcement to the public, as well as some technical development info (often previews of the game or developer interviews are a great source)
- This section also could use some merging of the 1-2 sentence paragraphs. Paragraphs should be 3-4 lines minimum and (personal opinion here), no more than 8-10 lines at ~1280x720 resolution
- The Reception section could use overall expansion. The lead paragraph in that section looks decent, but the positive/negative comment paragraphs need beefed up. Discussion of the new control scheme, controls, graphics, online play, etc are some ideas to help that.
- Once the body is cleaned up, I recommend expanding the lead. And article of this size could probably do with a 2 paragraph lead. The first for developer/publisher, release and gameplay info, the second for a summary of the reception of the game.