Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Minnesota/All-time list

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Given are the years of the first and last official maps the routes appear on (the date of legislation for pre-1934 routes). These are not always the exact years the routes were created or eliminated.

from to notes
MN 1 1934 now
MN 1 1920 1933
→ US 61 (part), US 65 (part), US 218 (part), 88
MN 2 1920 1933
→ US 10 (part), US 210
MN 3 1962
← 218 (part)
now
MN 3 1920 1954
→ 210 (part)
MN 4 1920 now
MN 5 1934 now preliminary plan had this as 26
MN 5 never never proposed on MN 55 west of Minneapolis in the preliminary plan
MN 5 1920 1933
→US 169 (part), US 65 (part)
MN 6 1934 now
MN 6 1920 1933
→ US 75
MN 7 1934 now preliminary plan had this as 66
MN 7 never never proposed on LR 209 in the preliminary plan, but this became MN 218 instead
MN 7 1920 1933
→ US 14 (part)
part swapped with 99 shortly after
MN 8 1920 1933
→ US 2 (part), 69 (part), US 53 (part)
MN 9 1934 now
MN 9 1920 1933
→ US 16
MN 10 1920 1933
→ US 12 (part), 9 (part), 27 (part)
MN 11 1920 now
MN 12 1920 1933
→ US 10-12, US 212 (part), 7 (part), 41
MN 13 1920 now
MN 14 1920 1933
→ 19 (part)
MN 15 1920 now
MN 16 1979
← US 16 (part)
now
MN 16 1920 1933
→ 73 (part), 62 (part), 60 (part)
MN 17 1967
← US 16 (part)
1979 unlabeled until 1971 (so could have been US 16 even though I-90 was open and old US 16 east of Luverne and west of Beaver Creek was gone)
MN 17 1941
← 23 (part)
1961
→ 9 (part)
MN 17 1920 1940
→ 23 (part)
MN 18 1920 now
MN 19 1934 now
MN 19 1920 1933
→ US 371 (part)
MN 20 1920 now
MN 21 1920 now
MN 22 1920 now
MN 23 1920 now
MN 24 1920 now
MN 25 1920 now
MN 26 1934 now preliminary plan had this as 73
MN 26 never never proposed on LR 121 the preliminary plan (which had US 212 going through Chanhassen and east via MN 5), but this became MN 5 instead
MN 26 1920 1933
→ US 12 (part)
MN 27 1934 now
MN 27 1920 1933
→ US 10 (part), US 371 (part)
MN 28 1920 now
MN 29 1920 now
MN 30 1934 now preliminary plan had this as 77
MN 30 1920 1933
→ 73 (part)
preliminary plan had this staying as MN 30 and extending north
MN 31 1920 1969
→ 200 (part)
MN 32 1920 now
MN 33 1934 now
MN 33 1920 1933
→ 1 (part)
MN 34 1920 now
MN 35 1920 1958
→ 135
MN 36 1934 now
MN 36 1920 1933
→ 3 (part)
MN 37 1934 now
MN 37 1920 1933
→ US 10 (part)
MN 38 1934 now
MN 38 1920 1933
→ 29 (part)
MN 39 1946 now
MN 39 1934 1940
→ 23 (part)
was part of 29 in the preliminary plan
MN 39 never never proposed on LR 144 on the preliminary plan, but this ended up being MN 119 and part of MN 73 instead
MN 39 1920 1933
→ 22 (part)
MN 40 1934 now
MN 40 1920 1933
→ US 218 (part)
MN 41 1934 now
MN 41 1920 1933
→ 30 (part)
MN 42 1920 now
MN 43 1920 now
MN 44 1920 now
MN 45 1934 now
MN 45 1920 1933
→ US 212 (part)
MN 46 1934 now
MN 46 never never proposed on LR 120 on the preliminary plan, but this ended up being MN 110 instead because of US 52
MN 46 1920 1933
→ US 8 (part)
was part of 72 in the preliminary plan
MN 47 1962
← 56 (part)
now
MN 47 1920 1961
→ 30 (part)
MN 48 1934 now
MN 48 1920 1933
→ 67 (part)
MN 49 1934 1998
MN 49 1920 1933
→ 7 (part), 17 (part)
MN 50 1920 now
MN 51 1934 now
MN 51 1920 1933
→ US 212 (part)
MN 52 1920 1933
→ 5 (part)
MN 52 never never proposed on LR 186 in the preliminary plan, but this ended up being MN 66 instead because of US 52
MN 53 1920 1933
→ 55 (part), 56 (part)
MN 54 1920 2020
MN 55 1934 now Preliminary plan had this as US 261/MN 261 southeast of Minneapolis and MN 5 northwest of Minneapolis
MN 55 1920 1933
→ 45
renumbered because US 55 still existed in the preliminary plan
MN 56 1920 now
MN 57 1920 now
MN 58 1920 now
MN 59 1920 1935
→ US 63
was US 59 in the preliminary plan
MN 60 1920 now
MN 61 1991
← US 61 (part)
now
MN 61 1920 1933
→ 6 (part)
MN 62 1934 now
MN 62 1989 now
MN 62 1920 1933
→ US 10 (part)
MN 63 1934 1934
→ 73
numbered as extension of US 63?
MN 63 1920 1933
→ US 8 (part)
MN 64 1934 now
MN 64 1920 1933
→ US 52 (part)
MN 65 1934 now
MN 65 1920 1933
→ 92 (part)
MN 66 1962
← 256
2013 why this number?
MN 66 1934 1961
→ 18 (part), 27 (part)
preliminary plan had this as 52
MN 66 1920 1933
→ 7 (part)
preliminary plan had this staying as 66 and extending east
MN 67 1920 now
MN 68 1920 now
MN 69 1934 1934
→ 94
MN 69 1920 1933
→ 55 (part)
MN 70 1934 now
MN 70 1920 1933
→ 4 (part)
MN 71 1923 1933
→ 27 (part)
doesn't actually appear on any official maps; apparently found unconstitutional
MN 72 1923 now doesn't appear on official maps until 1929 (when LR 72 was amended)
MN 73 1935
← 63
now
MN 73 1934 1934
→ US 59
LR 73: 60 (part)
preliminary plan had this as part of 60, part of 17, part of 29, part of 39, and 30
MN 73 never never proposed on LR 198 in the preliminary plan, but became MN 26 when Minnesota was planning to extend US 73
MN 74 1934 now LR 74
MN 75 N/A N/A LR 75: 43 (part)
MN 76 1934 now LR 76
MN 77 1979
← 36 (part)
now LR 77: 30 (part) (was going to be part of 77 in the preliminary plan)
MN 77 never never proposed on MN 30 in the preliminary plan until US 77 was added to plans
MN 78 1934 now LR 78: 43 (part)
MN 79 1934 now LR 79: 139 (was going to be 79 in the preliminary plan)
MN 80 1934 now LR 80; swapped with US 16 in 1946-1947
MN 81 1987
← US 52 (part)
1987
MN 81 1934 1954
→ US 75 (part)
LR 81: 56 (part)
MN 82 1934 1954
→ 9 (part)
LR 82: 30 (part)
MN 83 1934 now LR 83
MN 84 1934 now LR 84: 4 (part)
MN 85 1934 1949
→ 92 (part)
LR 85: 73 (part), 60 (part)
MN 86 1934 now LR 86
MN 87 1934 now LR 87: 22 (part)
MN 88 1981
← US 8 (part)
1995
MN 88 1934 1950
→ 49 (part)
LR 88: 39
MN 89 1934 now LR 89: 47 (part)
MN 90 1934 1958
→ 190
LR 90: 19 (part)
MN 91 1934 now LR 91
MN 92 1934 now LR 92: 47 (part)
MN 93 1962
← 259
now why this number?
MN 93 1934 1961
→ 67 (part), 68 (part)
LR 93
MN 94 1935
← 69
1958
→ 194
MN 94 1934 1934
→ US 10 (part)
LR 94
MN 95 1934 now LR 95
MN 96 1934 now LR 96
MN 97 1934 now LR 97
MN 98 1934 1995 LR 98; swapped with US 8 in 1954-1956
MN 99 1934 now LR 99
MN 100 1934 now LR 100: 19 (part)
MN 101 1934 now LR 101 (1933-2017): 165
MN 102 1934 now LR 102: LR 1 thru MSP
MN 103 1989 1993
→ US 52 (part)
unlabeled; [1] lists it; anyone have another source?
MN 103 1934 1958
→ 7 (part)
LR 103: LR 1 thru Duluth
MN 104 1934 now LR 104: LR 3 through MSP
MN 105 1934 now LR 105: LR 5 thru MSP
MN 106 1934 now LR 106: LR 8 thru Duluth
MN 107 1934 now LR 107: LR 10 thru MSP
MN 108 1934 now LR 108: LR 12 thru MSP
MN 109 1934 now LR 109: LR 45 thru MSP
MN 110 1965
← 100 (part)
2018
→ 62 (part)
MN 110 1934 1957 LR 110: 56 (part); Preliminary plan had this as 46
MN 110 never never was proposed on LR 153 on the preliminary plan; this became part of US 52; the old route became part of MN 73 and the new MN 79
MN 111 1934 now LR 111: LR 52 thru MSP
MN 112 1934 2019 LR 112 (1933-2019 but apparently hasn't been satisfied yet): LR 53 thru MSP
MN 113 1934 now LR 113: LR 62 thru MSP
MN 114 1934 now LR 114 (1933-1986): LR 63 thru MSP
MN 115 1934 now LR 115: US 218 (part)
MN 116 1962
← I-90B
1979 Austin
MN 116 1934 1954
→31 (part)
LR 116: 55 (part), 56 (part)
MN 117 1934 now LR 117: 13 (part), 100 (part)
MN 118 1972 1999
→ US 10 (part)
unlabeled until 1991
MN 118 1934 1942 LR 118: 36 (part), 90?
MN 119 1934 now LR 119: 7 (part); preliminary plan had this as part of 39
MN 119 never never proposed on LR 129 in the preliminary plan, but this became MN 152 instead
MN 120 1965
← 100 (part)
now LR 120 (1933-1957): 110 (route was repealed in 2001 but apparently hasn't been satisfied yet)
MN 120 1936 when? where was 120 in 1936?
MN 121 1936 now LR 121: 5 (part)
not legislatively defined?
MN 122 1989
← US 12 (part)
1995 LR 122: US 14 (part), 111
MN 123 1947
← 23 (part)
now LR 123: 112 (1933-2017)
MN 124 1962
← 4 (part)
2001 LR 124: 109
Lake Avenue, Paynesville
why this number?
MN 125 N/A N/A LR 125: 51
MN 126 N/A N/A LR 126 (1933-1998): 49
MN 127 1968 2009
→ 27 (part)
LR 127 (1933-1978): US 61 (part)
MN 128 N/A N/A LR 128: 57 (part)
MN 129 N/A N/A LR 129 (1933-1986): 152
MN 130 N/A N/A LR 130: 100 (part)
MN 131 N/A N/A LR 131: 115
MN 132 N/A N/A LR 132: 95 (part)
MN 133 N/A N/A LR 133: 70
MN 134 N/A N/A LR 134: 107
MN 135 1959
← 35
now LR 135: 27 (part)
MN 136 N/A N/A LR 136: 1 (part), 89
MN 137 N/A N/A LR 137: 6 (part)
MN 138 N/A N/A LR 138: 85
MN 139 1934 now LR 139: 84
preliminary plan had this as 79 to match LR 79
MN 140 N/A N/A LR 140: 72 (part)
MN 141 N/A N/A LR 141: US 71 (part)
MN 142 N/A N/A LR 142: 55 (part)
MN 143 N/A N/A LR 143: 104
MN 144 N/A N/A LR 144: 40 (part), 73 (part), 119 (part)
MN 145 N/A N/A LR 145: 40 (part)
MN 146 N/A N/A LR 146: 17 (part)
MN 147 N/A N/A LR 147: 7 (part)
MN 148 N/A N/A LR 148: 103
MN 149 1981
← 49 (part)
now LR 149: US 12-77
MN 150 N/A N/A LR 150: 4 (part)
MN 151 N/A N/A LR 151: 15 (part)
MN 152 1934 1987 LR 152: 9 (part); Preliminary plan had this as MN 119
MN 153 N/A N/A LR 153 (1933-1978): US 52 (part)
MN 154 N/A N/A LR 154: 68 (part)
MN 155 N/A N/A LR 155: US 212 (part)
MN 156 1995
← 56 (part)
now LR 156: 56 (part)
MN 157 N/A N/A LR 157: 18 (part)
MN 158 N/A N/A LR 158: 11 (part)
MN 159 N/A N/A LR 159: 65 (part)
MN 160 N/A N/A LR 160: 1 (part)
MN 161 N/A N/A LR 161: 58 (part)
MN 162 N/A N/A LR 162: 34 (part)
MN 163 N/A N/A LR 163: 63
MN 164 N/A N/A LR 164: 33
MN 165 1934 1956
→ US 65 (part)
LR 165: 46
MN 166 N/A N/A LR 166: 1 (part)
MN 167 2022 ← 67 (part) now LR 167: 169
MN 168 N/A N/A LR 168: 31 (part), 92 (part)
MN 169 1934 now LR 169: 92 (part)
MN 170 N/A N/A LR 170: 1 (part)
MN 171 1954
← US 59 (part)
now LR 171
MN 172 1962
← 72 (part)
now LR 172: 11 (part)
MN 173 N/A N/A LR 173: 1 (part)
MN 174 N/A N/A LR 174: 73 (part)
MN 175 1962 now LR 175: 81
why this number for LR 324? I suppose it's a spur off US 75
MN 176 N/A N/A LR 176: 116
MN 177 N/A N/A LR 177: 32 (part)
MN 178 N/A N/A LR 178: 102
MN 179 N/A N/A LR 179: 82 (part)
MN 180 N/A N/A LR 180: 78 (part)
MN 181 N/A N/A LR 181: 78 (part), 108 (part)
MN 182 N/A N/A LR 182: 34 (part)
MN 183 N/A N/A LR 183: 3 (part)
MN 184 N/A N/A LR 184: 106
MN 185 N/A N/A LR 185: 23 (part)
MN 186 N/A N/A LR 186: 66
MN 187 N/A N/A LR 187: 101
MN 188 N/A N/A LR 188: 55 (part)
MN 189 N/A N/A LR 189: 118
MN 190 1970
← US 65 (part)
1979
→ 121 (part)
adjacent to the first one
MN 190 1959
← 90
1969
→ 121 (part)
LR 190: 27 (part)
MN 191 N/A N/A LR 191: 117
MN 192 N/A N/A LR 192: 48
MN 193 N/A N/A LR 193: 64
MN 194 1959
← 94
now LR 194: 13 (part)
MN 195 N/A N/A LR 195: 13 (part)
MN 196 N/A N/A LR 196: 38
MN 197 1983
← US 2-71 (part)
now LR 197: 87 (part)
why this number?
MN 198 N/A N/A LR 198: 26
MN 199 N/A N/A LR 199: 105
MN 200 1970
← 31, 34 (part)
now LR 200: 113
MN 201 1969
← 101 (part)
1987 LR 201: 83 (part)
MN 202 1965
← US 2 (part)
1967 LR 202: 37
what LR was this?
MN 203 N/A N/A LR 203: US 2 (part)
MN 204 N/A N/A LR 204: 69 (part)
MN 205 N/A N/A LR 205: 27 (part)
MN 206 N/A N/A LR 206: 108 (part)
MN 207 N/A N/A LR 207: 87 (part)
MN 208 N/A N/A LR 208: 114
MN 209 N/A N/A LR 209: 218
MN 210 1956
← 3
now both 210s are on the 1956 map, but then the east one became part of 39 (only to revert to 210 in 1971 when US 210 died)
MN 210 1950 1956
→ 39 (part)
LR 210: 23 (part)
MN 211 N/A N/A LR 211: 82 (part)
MN 212 1935
← US 212 (part)
1979
→ 5 (part)
LR 212 (1943): 100 (part)
MN 213 N/A N/A LR 213 (1943): 39
MN 214 N/A N/A LR 214 (1945): 60 (part)
MN 215 N/A N/A LR 215 (1949): 210 (part)
MN 216 1950 1961
→ 37 (part)
LR 216 (1949)
MN 217 1950 now LR 217 (1949)
MN 218 1934 1961
→ 3, 25 (part)
LR 218 (1949): 89 (part)
preliminary plan had this as 7
MN 219 1950 now LR 219 (1949)
MN 220 1950 now LR 220 (1949)
MN 221 1950 1952
→ 169 (part)
LR 221 (1949)
MN 222 1950 now LR 222 (1949-2019 but apparently hasn't been satisfied yet)
MN 223 1950 now LR 223 (1949)
MN 224 1950 2005 LR 224 (1949-2005)
MN 225 1950 2017 LR 225 (1949-2017)
MN 226 1950 now LR 226 (1949)
MN 227 1950 2012 LR 227 (1949-2012)
MN 228 1950 2015 LR 228 (1949-2015)
MN 229 N/A N/A LR 229 (1949): 108 (part)
MN 230 N/A N/A LR 230 (1949): US 10 (part)?
MN 231 1964
← US 52 (part)
1987 LR 231 (1949-1988)
LR 231 carried US 52 until it was moved onto I-94
MN 232 1950 2012 LR 232 (1949-1996)
MN 233 N/A N/A LR 233 (1949-2001): 25 (part)
MN 234 1960 1961 LR 234 (1949): shown as proposed 234 in 1960-1961, but then removed and doesn't appear until 1966 as an extension of 64
MN 235 1950 2013 LR 235 (1949-2013)
MN 236 1950 1987 LR 236 (1949-1984)
MN 237 1950 now LR 237 (1949)
MN 238 1950 now LR 238 (1949)
MN 239 N/A N/A LR 239 (1949): 152 (part), now 15 (part)
MN 240 1950 1961
→ 24 (part)
LR 240 (1949)
MN 241 1956 now LR 241 (1949)
didn't need to exist until 152 was realigned out of St. Michael
MN 242 1950 2005 LR 242 (1949-2006)
MN 243 1950 now LR 243 (1949)
MN 244 1950 now LR 244 (1949-2001 but apparently hasn't been satisfied yet)
MN 245 N/A N/A LR 245 (1949): 50 (part)
MN 246 1950 now LR 246 (1949)
MN 247 1950 now LR 247 (1949)
MN 248 1950 now LR 248 (1949)
MN 249 1950 1989 LR 249 (1949-1989)
MN 250 1950 now LR 250 (1949)
MN 251 1950 now LR 251 (1949)
MN 252 1979
← US 169 (part)
now
MN 252 1956 1961
→ US 218 (part)
LR 252 (1949)
initially proposed; part became I-90 in 1959 or 1960; the rest doesn't appear in 1962-1965 and is US 218 in 1966
MN 253 1950 2019 LR 253 (1949-2019)
MN 254 1950 2019 LR 254 (1949-2019)
MN 255 N/A N/A LR 255 (1949): 109 (part)
MN 256 1950 1961
→ 66
LR 256 (1949-2013, 2014 amendment)
MN 257 1950 now LR 257 (1949)
MN 258 1950 2012 LR 258 (1949-2012)
MN 259 1950 1961
→ 93
LR 259 (1949)
MN 260 N/A N/A LR 260 (1949): 41 (part)
MN 261 (also proposed as US 261) never never proposed on MN 55 east of Minneapolis in the preliminary plan
MN 261 1950 1995 LR 261 (1949-1996)
MN 262 1950 2007 LR 262 (1949-2007)
MN 263 1950 now LR 263 (1949)
MN 264 1950 now LR 264 (1949)
MN 265 N/A N/A LR 265 (1949): US 59 (part), was already an unmaintained part of US 59
MN 266 1950 2003 LR 266 (1949-2003)
MN 267 1950 now LR 267 (1949)
MN 268 1950 2003 LR 268 (1949-2005)
MN 269 1950 now LR 269 (1949)
MN 270 1950 now LR 270 (1949)
MN 271 1950 now LR 271 (1949)
MN 272 1950 1961
→ 68 (part)
LR 272 (1949)
MN 273 1950 2003 LR 273 (1949-2003)
MN 274 1950 2022 → 67 (part), CR 6 (part) LR 274 (1949)
MN 275 1950 2015 LR 275 (1949-2015)
MN 276 N/A N/A LR 276 (1949): 40 (part)
MN 277 1950 2019 LR 277 (1949-2019)
MN 278 1950 1981 LR 278 (1949-1982)
MN 279 N/A N/A LR 279 (1949): 36 (part), already shown since 1934 (!)
MN 280 1951 now LR 280 (1949)
should appear in 1950
MN 281 1950 1961
→ 23 (part)
LR 281 (1949)
MN 282 1950 now LR 282 (1949)
MN 283 N/A N/A LR 283 (1949): 113 (part)
MN 284 1950 now LR 284 (1949)
MN 285 N/A N/A LR 285 (1949-1978): I-35 (part)?? first appears as proposed in 1959
"NOTE:CS-0918 (LEGISLATIVE ROUTE 285) COVERS PROPOSED LOCATION FROM USTH-61 TO MNTH-210"
MN 286 1950 now LR 286 (1949)
MN 287 1950 now LR 287 (1949)
MN 288 1952 1997 LR 288 (1951-1998)
MN 289 1952 now LR 289 (1951)
MN 290 1952 2009 LR 290 (1951-2009)
MN 291 1952 2014 LR 291 (1951-2012)
MN 292 1952 now LR 292 (1951)
MN 293 1952 2009 LR 293 (1951-2009)
MN 294 1952 2005 LR 294 (1951-2006)
MN 295 1952 2009 LR 295 (1951-2008)
MN 296 1952 1989 LR 296 (1951-1988)
MN 297 1952 2009 LR 297 (1951-2010)
MN 298 1952 now LR 298 (1951-2019 but apparently hasn't been satisfied yet)
MN 299 1952 now LR 299 (1951-2019 but apparently hasn't been satisfied yet)
MN 300 1952 1995 LR 300 (1951-1996)
MN 301 1952 now LR 301 (1951)
MN 302 1952 2001 LR 302 (1951-2003)
MN 303 1952 1973 LR 303 (1951-1973)
MN 304 N/A N/A LR 304 (1955): 7 (part), appears to be the proposed Montevideo bypass east of 29, but maps aren't detailed enough to show when it was built
MN 305 N/A N/A LR 305 (1955-2001): 25 (part), shown proposed back to 1951 and complete in 1959; no longer necessary after 2001 when 18 was cut back to 25
MN 306 N/A N/A LR 306 (1955): 35 (part), appears to be a proposed realignment between Gilbert and Biwabik, but maps aren't detailed enough to show when it was built
MN 307 N/A N/A LR 307 (1955): US 2 (part)
MN 308 1956 now LR 308 (1955)
MN 309 1952? 2014 LR 309 (1957-2014)
Brainerd inset expanded in 1962; 309 probably existed earlier
MN 310 1960 now LR 310 (1959 - yes, they screwed up the order of 161-309, but it was corrected)
MN 311 N/A N/A LR 311 (1959): 73 (part), first appears in 1966, but not labeled
MN 312 2001 2007
→ US 212 (part)
LR 312 (1959-1978): appears to be an extension of 42 south to I-90, but that doesn't appear until 2003 as LR 338
unlabeled
MN 313 1960 now LR 313 (1959)
MN 314 N/A N/A LR 314 (1959): proposed extension of US 8?
MN 315 N/A N/A LR 315 (1959): US 53-71
MN 316 1960 now LR 316 (1959)
MN 317 1960 now LR 317 (1959)
MN 318 1960 1983 LR 318 (1959-1974)
deleted when the Willmar bypass was built
MN 319 N/A N/A LR 319 (1959): 7 (part), first shown in 1965
MN 320 N/A N/A LR 320 (1959): 246 (part)
MN 321 N/A N/A LR 321 (1959): 22 (part)
MN 322 1960 2001 LR 322 (1959-2001)
MN 323 N/A N/A LR 323 (1959-2019 but apparently hasn't been satisfied yet): 298 (part)
may exist?
MN 324 1965 2003 LR 324 (1961): 175
MN 325 N/A N/A LR 325 (1961): 72 (part)
MN 326 1964 1969
→ 49 (part)
LR 326 (1963-1996)
MN 327 N/A N/A LR 327 (1967-1980): I-335, appears in 1965 and first labeled in 1967
MN 328 N/A N/A LR 328 (1971): 175 (part)
MN 329 never on maps now LR 329 (1971)
MN 330 1972 now LR 330 (1971)
MN 331 N/A N/A LR 331 (1971-1996): 44 (part)
MN 332 1976 2009 LR 332 (1974, effective 1976-2011)
MN 333 1981 2009 LR 333 (1975): 610
MN 334 N/A N/A LR 334 (1980): US 52 (part), on Robert Street
MN 335 N/A N/A LR 335 (1980-2008): 333
MN 336 1993 now LR 336 (1991)
MN 337 N/A N/A LR 337 (2001): 371B
MN 338 N/A N/A LR 338 (2003): 42 (part), earlier LR 312
MN 339 N/A N/A LR 339 (2013): new Stillwater Bridge
MN 361 1970
← US 61 (part)
2011
MN 371 1972
← US 371
now
MN 410 never now proposed
MN 610 1987 now

1975:

1957:

1959: connecting links at Geneva (N/A), Medford (N/A), White Bear (96), Rush City (361), Pine City (324), Wyoming (98) - all of these seem to have been legislative routes anyway