Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/Washington State Route 339/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Washington State Route 339 (4 net support votes)
[edit]- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The discussion was closed as promote by Imzadi1979 (talk) 05:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Washington State Route 339 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
- Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
- Nominator's comments: looking for the 3rd A-Class article in WA
- Nominated by: Admrboltz (talk) 17:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now - Needs images, and expansion in rd and history.~~ ĈĠ ☺ Simple? 00:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Please be more specific. Yes, I know an image would be helpful but its not a absolute necessity. As far as the RD, what specificaly are you looking for. I described the route. And regards to the history that is the history of 339, it wouldn't be focused if I went on to ramble on about the water that 339 runs on. --Admrboltz (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Point taken. Support now. ~~ ĈĠ ☺ Simple? 21:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please be more specific. Yes, I know an image would be helpful but its not a absolute necessity. As far as the RD, what specificaly are you looking for. I described the route. And regards to the history that is the history of 339, it wouldn't be focused if I went on to ramble on about the water that 339 runs on. --Admrboltz (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments Should Blake Island State Park be wikilinked?
- Is it possible to find the year when the 339 designation was applied?
- That's all - good job! --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support comments addressed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 23:35, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose- Longer lead is necessary. Also, I'd like to see a route description of what landmarks the ferry passes near before I can support.Mitch32(UP) 23:34, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]- No, for an article as short as this, the lead in its current state is fine, per WP:MOS. Any more would become excessive. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm looking for 1 paragraph - just so it covers at least all sections in one way or another. Also of note - I am talking it over on IRC about it.Mitch32(UP) 00:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It already is one paragraph. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:37, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm looking for 1 paragraph - just so it covers at least all sections in one way or another. Also of note - I am talking it over on IRC about it.Mitch32(UP) 00:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No, for an article as short as this, the lead in its current state is fine, per WP:MOS. Any more would become excessive. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- My full support - I don't particularly think this is an FACable article, but who knows. Good luck.Mitch32(UP) 00:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, though a picture of the route (maybe a picture of the ferry boat :-) would be nice. - Algorerhythms (talk) 04:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.