Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment/Timeline of the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season
Appearance
Archived discussion. Current status: {{FA-Class}}
This is pretty good in its current state. It was nominated to be a Good Article and failed because the reviewer thought it should be a featured list instead. I agree with that and want to nominate it to be a featured list at some point in the near future. However, there are few issues that I feel should be discussed before the nomination happens.
- First, should there be satellite pictures? I don't intend to add a picture of every storm, only the nice pictures. However, is it not possible that satellite photos are unsuitable for a timeline?
- Second, the graphical timeline might be better placed somewhere other than the very top of the article, perhaps just after the lead above all text.
- Finally, the names of the authors of the tropical cyclone reports need to be added. I'm getting to that right now.
Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 20:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Satellite images might work, but what about having a track map for each month's activity? There'd be a map of just Arlene and Bret, one of just Cindy through Gert, one of Harvey through Lee, Lee through Nineteen, Stan to Beta, Gamma to Epsilon (with only Epsilon's track in November), one for Epsilon and Zeta's portion in December, and January Zeta. The graphical timeline might be better after the intro, or right at the beginning of "timeline of events". Be sure it mentions every time a storm dissipates. For example, it says Epsilon weakens to a TD and loses its convection, but it doesn't say when it dissipates. All-in-all, not bad, and though it's not a normal list it would probably work better as a FL than an FA. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- I just finished adding proper author names. I'll double check for dissipations.
- Another issue: Should, at the head of each month's section, be a brief summary. For example, for June we could say: "Two systems formed in June. Normally, a season has a June system every other year or so."
- Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 20:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yea, sure. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- If a set of monthly tracks is wanted I'll make them up. 2005 is my season after all, it can expect a quick response, if that is what consenseus calls for ;) Hink, bear in mind that not every storm in 2005AHS dissipated. Alpha did NOT dissipate, it was absorbed by a larger storm (Wilma). This should be seen as the model timeline imo - if we can get this one to FL status we can get them all to it (and any timelines of a similar quality should be brought here as A-class).--Nilfanion (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Huh, hadn't thought of that (good point), though the circumstances for which it fails to meet the criteria for being a tropical cyclone should be listed on the timeline. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- If a set of monthly tracks is wanted I'll make them up. 2005 is my season after all, it can expect a quick response, if that is what consenseus calls for ;) Hink, bear in mind that not every storm in 2005AHS dissipated. Alpha did NOT dissipate, it was absorbed by a larger storm (Wilma). This should be seen as the model timeline imo - if we can get this one to FL status we can get them all to it (and any timelines of a similar quality should be brought here as A-class).--Nilfanion (talk) 21:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yea, sure. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Nilfanion, can we get the track maps to see how it looks? Titoxd(?!?) 20:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC)