Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment/Cyclone Rosita

Cyclone Rosita

Archived discussion. Current status: {{GA-Class}}

Alright, now that the article is a GA (yay!!!!!), what else could be done for it to be an A? I'm guessing impact pictures are needed. RaNdOm26 17:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. As soon as some pictures are found, it should be a GA. Maybe the storm history could be a _little longer. 17:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

If possible, a damage pic would be nice, but it looks pretty good. Maybe A class with a copyedit. Hurricanehink (talk) 04:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doubt it because damage pics in Australia are crown copyrighted and thus we cannot use them. Storm05 14:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't know what you're talking about, don't say it. Crown copyright only applies to Government photos and works of the Australian government. Private photos may be copyrighted or free, depending on the individual. – Ch acor 14:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thats still impossible because free private photos from Australia are non existant unless that person is a NOAA or US Goverment employee working in Australia (which i seriously doubt since there are very few or no NOAA or US weather or government centers in Australia) Storm05 14:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Private photos" meaning those taken by members of the public, individuals. Please at least make an attempt to know what you're talking about? – Ch acor 14:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And i still say thats still impossible, because the odds of indiviuals of putting their photos in public domain are very, very slim. Storm05 14:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously haven't heard of the GNU FDL, which Wikipedia runs on. Not surprising, since this happened after all. – Ch acor 14:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Individuals putting their photos in the public domain isn't that slim. I emailed someone about a damage pic for Hurricane Fabian and they were fine with it. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]