Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2022/February
This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Proposals, February 2022
Firearm manufacturer stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
(Following the style of Category:Cycle manufacturer stubs and that template)
Upmerge targets would be Category:Firearm stubs and Category:Manufacturing company stubs. There probably aren't enough to reach 60, but on the off chance there is, the category would be Category:Firearm manufacturer stubs.
Curbon7 (talk) 09:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support Ingratis (talk) 04:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support; n.b. one of the parent cats is in the process of being renamed from Category:Firearms stubs to to Category:Firearm stubs. Her Pegship (?) 06:08, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Engraver stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create engravers as proposed; create medallist as upmerged template only.
I'd like to propose:
On a part count / estimate, there are roughly 60-90 possibles in each of the national cats, and slightly fewer in the over-cat. There is a partial overlap with {{printmaker-stub}}, but not all engravers are printmakers and vice versa, so I think there is room for both. However, I'd be grateful for any thoughts. Ingratis (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support for {{Engraver-stub}}. Tentative support for the country ones if they make sense. Curbon7 (talk) 10:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks - there are 87 definite French ones and 198 definite Italian ones, and I don't doubt that the UK figure will be similar. Ingratis (talk) 04:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom, and once created please change the wording for {{printmaker-stub}}, which currently includes engravers. Her Pegship (?) 23:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks - no problem. To avoid confusion I'd like also to create {{Medallist-stub}} // Category:Medallist stubs to deal with those engravers who worked on medals and coins instead of prints. There may well not be 60 of these so it would be upmerged to Engraver-stubs. Ingratis (talk) 03:39, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
French dance bio stubs (pt 2)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was speedy create.
Speedy proposal: There are now 68 templated stubs, so now proposing the creation of the category Category:French dance biographical stubs Ingratis (talk) 00:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
French dance bio stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was created.
At an estimate there are c. 50-60 stubs that would fit this. With apologies, in a fit of distraction I've already created the upmerged template {{France-dance-bio-stub}} (as opposed to "France-dancer-bio", as I want it also to cover choreographers and similar); no present need for the cat at the moment. Ingratis (talk) 18:14, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Curbon7 (talk) 19:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Taiwan album stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was created.
Created {{Taiwan-album-stub}} to tag a bunch of album stubs in Category:Taiwanese music stubs and it already exceeded 90 transclusions after a few minutes and I'm not yet done tagging. Proposing stub category creation Category:Taiwan album stubs. Twoggo (talk) 23:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Appears to be no objection, so I've created the category. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Telangana Rashtra Samithi politician stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
The petscan shows around 45 articles that would benefit from this. The parent being Category:Telangana Rashtra Samithi politicians. Most of the articles currently reside at Category:Telangana politician stubs An upmerged template would reside at {{Telangana-TRS-politician-stub}} and would feed into Category:Telangana politician stubs until a category is approved. — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 15:08, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Be sure to peruse through the Telangana pol categories; often times with these Indian pol articles is they aren't stub-sorted and aren't categorized correctly. Since the difference is only 15, it is probably likely that those 15 articles are hiding somewhere in the category tree. Curbon7 (talk) 00:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Restructuring Weapon stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Based on Category:Weapon stubs
I need a break from sorting politicians, so I'm gonna do a mini-project that's considerably more fun, and Category:Weapon stubs is in pretty bad shape, so I might as well start there!
(Any of the ones I'm proposing will be in bold, otherwise it will be restructuring)
- {{Weapon-stub}} // Category:Weapon stubs
- {{Explosive-weapon-stub}} // Category:Explosive weapon stubs (additional parent would be Category:Explosives stubs
- {{Ranged-weapon-stub}} // Category:Ranged weapon stubs
- {{Firearms-stub}} // Category:Firearms stubs
- {{Pistol-stub}} // Category:Pistol stubs
- {{Rifle-stub}} // Category:Rifle stubs
- {{Shotgun-stub}} // Category:Shotgun stubs
- {{Machinegun-stub}} // Category:Machinegun stubs
- Maybe a couple more like {{Submachinegun-stub}}
- {{Bow-stub}} // Category:Bow stubs (additional parent would be Category:Archery stubs)
- {{Firearms-stub}} // Category:Firearms stubs
- {{Melee-weapon-stub}} // Category:Melee weapon stubs
- {{Edged-weapon-stub}} // Category:Edged weapon stubs
- {{Sword-stub}} // Category:Sword stubs
- {{Axe-stub}} // Category:Axe stubs
- {{Knife-stub}} // Category:Knife stubs
- {{Polearm-stub}} // Category:Polearm stubs
- {{Blunt-weapon-stub}} // Category:Blunt weapons stubs (Maybe)
{{Club-stub}} // Category:Club stubs{{Staff-stub}} // Category:Staff stubs
- {{Shield-stub}} // Category:Shield stubs
- {{Edged-weapon-stub}} // Category:Edged weapon stubs
Curbon7 (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- I totally support the reorg as well as any upmerged templates you think would work (mind you, I know nothing about weaponry). I would hold off on creating new categories until the template use can be assessed. Her Pegship (?) 23:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yes that is a given of course. For example, with the bows, eyeballing it, I'm skeptical that it'll get to the 60 required, so it's unlikely that'll get its own cat. Curbon7 (talk) 02:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)