Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Robotics/Assessmentform

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Forms for assessing pages at B and A class.

B class

[edit]
  1. Structure
    1. Headings used to correctly split text into relevant and related sections. Y-N
    2. Lead (Intro) - does it correctly summarise the article. Y-TS-TB
    3. References, notes, bibliography - Is it a "further reading" or a true bibliography (these were the books used as references in this article), are notes separate from Refs. Y-N
  2. Content
    1. Subject complete - all aspects of the subject are covered. Y-N
    2. Neutrality - positive and negatives (where applicable) are covered with correct weighting. Y-N
    3. Refs
      1. References are reliable and more than one per paragraph, or in longer paragraphs more than one per two or three sentences. Y-TM-TF
      2. References are in a similar citation style. Y-N
  3. Prose and grammar
    1. Paragraphs not too small/big, sentences not too short Y-TB-TS
    2. Prose - consistent style throughout. Y-N
    3. MoS - copyedit necessary to tighten MoS parameters. Y-N (If yes, then instant fail? for non compliance with MoS)
  4. Images
    1. Pictures and diagrams - are there enough. Y-TM-TF
    2. Alt - do the images have the Alt=parameter included. Y-N


Y - Yes
N - No
TS - Too small
TB - Too big
TM - Too many
TF - Too few

Notes

[edit]

Here, the important issue is not to fail an article if it does not fulfil all the questions - rather it is to see if the article is at an acceptable level of compliance (between 70 and 100%) and to generate notes ready for progressing to the next level(WP:GA)

Some points would be an instant fail though.

Not meeting MoS may be due to minor infractions - but if there are major MoS issues the article should be failed until the work is remedied.
Similarly, neutrality may be slightly awry - but a major lack of neutrality would result in a fail.

A class

[edit]