Wikipedia:WikiProject Robotics/Assessment/Importance scale
| Priority | Description | Concepts
of AI, of sensing, of Locomotion etc. |
Robotic devices and sub-systems
Hardware/Software: of AI, of sensing, of locomotion etc |
People, companies and events
Such as: Mitchie, Lightwood controversy, Honda, DARPA challenge |
Robots
Such as: Freddy II, ASIMO, AUV Sentry | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top | An absolute "must-have" robotics article. |
|
|
|
||
| High | Very much needed, even vital, robotics articles. | Main robotics concepts, robots or robotics components
|
High-profile single robots and robotic devices or parts
|
Roboticists and robots of above-average notability
|
||
| Mid | Adds further depth, but not vital to robotics. | Most well-known concepts and components of robotics
|
Most non-routine robotic devices, parts or robots
|
All professional people who took part in a robotics, and aren't high or top importance
|
||
| Low | Not at all essential, or can be covered adequately by other articles. | Most robotics subsystems or robots
|
Routine robotics, many non-unique robots
|
Professional scientists who have taken part in robotics, people not crucially related to robotics.
|
| |
| NA | Importance not applicable |
This is used for articles which do not have an intrinsic importance. Such articles are usually Categories that group articles together rather than assign importance. For example "Robots in the 1980s" may not have importance whereas Robots in 1973 may well have specific robots and events that have attached importance or significance. | ||||
| ??? | This rating is not used. There is a Category:Unknown-importance Robotics articles for articles which have a robotics rating, but no importance level has been assigned: editors should feel free either to assign an importance level (Low-Priority or higher) or, if they are outside the project's scope, to remove the robotics banner from these articles.
| |||||