Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opera articles by quality

[edit]
 FA A GABCStartStub FLListCategoryDisambigDraftFilePortalProjectTemplateNA???Total
400564781,3137,9863,27632432,6599331612652583451935917,377

Quality scale

[edit]

Note (2 June 2008):

As preparation for a scheme of article assessment by Project members, most articles with the Project banner on their Talk pages have been automatically given an Opera Project rating of

  • FA, FL, GA, as appropriate, if the article has been awarded one of those statuses,
  • Stub, if the article has a Stub template, or
  • Start, if the article does not fall into any of the above categories. This is a provisional rating pending implementation of the assessment exercise

Some articles awarded Start have been manually upgraded to B where "Start" is manifestly inappropriate.

Points system for articles

[edit]

Operas

[edit]
Elements Points
Background/history of composition/discussion of plot and/or text, etc. 15
Performance history, including recent performance history and creators of roles
(the latter will normally appear in the Roles table)
15
Tabulated list of roles 05
Synopsis 10
Notable arias, etc.: (preferably embedded in the synopsis) 05
Critical appreciation, discussion of music etc. 15
Recordings 10
Illustrations, including musical illustrations 10
Inline references, notes, sources, external links 15

Opera singers

[edit]
Elements Points
Family background/studies 05
Early career and significant breakthroughs 10
Mature career including major debuts 20
List of roles (if available - with dates when possible) 10
Critical appreciation (with full sources) 15
Complete discography 10
Bibliography (if any) 05
Illustrations 10
Inline references, notes, sources, internal and external sources 15

Opera directors

[edit]
Elements Points
Family background/studies 05
Early career and assistant director jobs 10
Mature career, including full coverage of work outside opera 20
List of productions (if available - with dates when possible) 10
Critical appreciation (with full sources) 15
Complete videography 10
Bibliography (if any) 05
Illustrations 10
Inline references, notes, sources, internal and external sources 15

The points for each element are the most that can be allocated. Elements that are present but brief or incomplete would attract part-scores. The maximum total points for any article would thus be 100.