Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Harry Potter task force/Notability/Weasleys
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
merge to Weasley family
[edit]- Articles covered by this discussion
- Arthur Weasley
- Bill Weasley
- Charlie Weasley
- Fleur Delacour
- Fred and George Weasley
- Grandchildren of the Weasley family
- Molly Weasley
- Percy Weasley
- Discussion
Seems like an easy merge into Weasley family. We seem to be gradually developing this (correct, IMO) consensus that as important as some characters are to the story, they aren't all the important in the big picture. Here's one way to condense a whole bunch of articles into one, saving on individual notability concerns and citing the whole clan as important -- I'm sure there are some essay books out there to help with that. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, pretty easy, no content lost. Judgesurreal777 03:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed. Cramming so much information into one article will also force us to clear out the cruft and OR. I strongly suspect that we will end up with half a dozen individual character articles, a half dozen 'families', a couple of lists and lots of redirects! Happy-melon 20:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- All right, if there's no dissent in two days we'll merge. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 01:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'm OK with merging. – Basar (talk · contribs) 02:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- I agree merging would be a good idea - most of the pages to be merged probably don't meet WP:NN. I think some time should be spent looking for sources on the Weasley family - currently there is very little on the page. [[Guest9999 11:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC)]]
- I'm OK with merging. – Basar (talk · contribs) 02:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- All right, if there's no dissent in two days we'll merge. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 01:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed. Cramming so much information into one article will also force us to clear out the cruft and OR. I strongly suspect that we will end up with half a dozen individual character articles, a half dozen 'families', a couple of lists and lots of redirects! Happy-melon 20:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.