Wikipedia:WikiProject Mining/Peer Review
 |
| WikiProject Mining |
|---|
|
Portals  |
Use this page to request that an article is reviewed by a member of this WikiProject. You may also wish to list your article at WP:PR.
Somerset coalfield - Rating/Review Requested
[edit]- Somerset coalfield is currently unassessed by this project. I have done quite a bit of work on this article over the last couple of years, but I'm not an expert in the field and would appreciate comments or editing by anyone who knows more about coal mining than I do (& that wouldn't be difficult).— Rod talk 10:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- Rated B class and Mid (for now) importance for mining articles. Turgan Talk 23:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Rio Tinto Group - did substantial work on this with goal of eventually promoting to FA status - would like a review (and rating update) particularly of sections related to this project's scope; I have also requested a review at the business project. Bantman (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Pittston Coal strike
[edit]- The Pittston Coal strike article is part of a class project of mine. I need this to be reviewed by April 20. If anyone could please do this it would really help. Megzie113 (talk) 00:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Mining in Cornwall and Devon
[edit]- Could someone please review Mining in Cornwall and Devon. Currently Start Class, I would have thought it would be a little higher up the scale by now. Jowaninpensans (talk) 11:35, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
I was just wondering if someone could look through this article to see if there is something that could be added to complete it. This mine article has been a topic of interest to me since I recreated it months ago and I would like to bring it to FA class. Volcanoguy 03:16, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Little late, but I have been busy moving around the world...I will try to have a read through/copy edit tomorrow. --kelapstick(bainuu) 12:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- I did some expanding and copyediting since this article was last reviewed in February. Another review would be great. Thanks. Volcanoguy 11:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Peer review is up. Volcanoguy 12:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- What kind of a WikiProject is this? Out of all of the 15 active members in this WikiProject nobody gives any input in the peer review. Dosen't seem to follow WP:WIKIPROJECT. Volcanoguy 18:38, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- There doesn't seem to be many participants who participate in FAs and GAs etc. in general here. I'm not a very good writer, so I try not to mess things up too much. Maybe we aren't so much a wikiproject as a rag-tag group of editors who have an interest in mining. Kind of like the Dirty Dozen?--kelapstick(bainuu) 00:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- I am not asking to review the article's writing, just the scope, etc. Volcanoguy 17:48, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- As upseting as the lack of reply and action to your request is (happened to me before, too), keep in mind that everybody here is a volunteer. People do and look at what they got time and interest for. Sorry about your disapointment with this project, Calistemon (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- I am better off to not even mention when a mining article is at peer review or FAC because nothing seems to happen. Just more evidence of a solo project. If there are no comments in the next few days the peer review will be archived then I am better off just to post it at FAC. Volcanoguy 17:47, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think many of us do what we can, when we can. Everyone seems to edit in bursts. On this note, I will have a look at what you have written in the next day or so. Cheers, Turgan Talk 23:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Started looking this over today. Turgan Talk 22:30, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- I think it is looking pretty good. Lots of improvements from the peer review. I really don't have much to add at this time. Turgan Talk 03:33, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- I think many of us do what we can, when we can. Everyone seems to edit in bursts. On this note, I will have a look at what you have written in the next day or so. Cheers, Turgan Talk 23:12, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- I am better off to not even mention when a mining article is at peer review or FAC because nothing seems to happen. Just more evidence of a solo project. If there are no comments in the next few days the peer review will be archived then I am better off just to post it at FAC. Volcanoguy 17:47, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- As upseting as the lack of reply and action to your request is (happened to me before, too), keep in mind that everybody here is a volunteer. People do and look at what they got time and interest for. Sorry about your disapointment with this project, Calistemon (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- I am not asking to review the article's writing, just the scope, etc. Volcanoguy 17:48, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- There doesn't seem to be many participants who participate in FAs and GAs etc. in general here. I'm not a very good writer, so I try not to mess things up too much. Maybe we aren't so much a wikiproject as a rag-tag group of editors who have an interest in mining. Kind of like the Dirty Dozen?--kelapstick(bainuu) 00:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- What kind of a WikiProject is this? Out of all of the 15 active members in this WikiProject nobody gives any input in the peer review. Dosen't seem to follow WP:WIKIPROJECT. Volcanoguy 18:38, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
- Peer review is up. Volcanoguy 12:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- I did some expanding and copyediting since this article was last reviewed in February. Another review would be great. Thanks. Volcanoguy 11:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)