Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Hannibal (Barcid)
I didn't know of this page and started a normal Peer Review, so I request members of the project to take a look at Hannibal and its associated peer review. If you wish to respond here you can as well as both are on my watchlist. Thanks. Nobleeagle (Talk) 00:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Very nice article! A variety of minor issues that could be improved, though:
- Add {{Infobox Military Person}} at the top?
- Footnotes! In particular, things like direct quotes require specific citations; and generous addition of them for key facts throughout would be appropriate as well.
- The links in the "See also" section are redundant, and can be trimmed.
- The list of films bears the disclaimer "This list is incomplete"; it's an issue to be fixed, either by completing it or by removing the tag.
- Maybe use {{cquote}} for the various long quotes in the article?
Overall, though, this is quite well written! Keep up the great work! Kirill Lokshin 00:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
I second Kirill Lokshin's comments — very nice article; footnotes needed.
- Footnotes: The article uses <ref><nowiki> tags for the few references. Likely, the references have been used for the entire article, not just those citations; also, there are likely specific page references that apply in various locations in the article. Using <nowiki><ref name="yyyy"> for general citations, and <ref> for specific pages, for example, would help. (You are probably aware of this reference, but just in case, see Wikipedia:Footnotes.) —ERcheck (talk) @ 00:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)