Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/SMS Kaiser (1911)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Passed --Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:57, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
Yet another of my German dreadnoughts, Kaiser was the lead ship of the third class built by the Imperial Navy. The ship conducted a long-distance cruise to South America shortly before the outbreak of World War I, and participated in most of the fleet actions of the conflict. I look forward to working with reviewers with the goal of eventually taking this article to FAC. Thanks in advance to all those who take the time to review this article. Parsecboy (talk) 17:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments: A few comments to get the review started. I haven't read through the whole article as yet, though.- no dab links, no external links broken (no action required);
some images have alt text, but others don't. You might consider adding it in (only a suggestion, not a requirement);- images appear to be appropriately licenced (no action required);
in the infobox, in the Crew field you have "1043 enlisted", but I think that for consistency of style you should use "1,043 enlisted" as you have used the comma elsewhere for values over a thousand;in the Notes section you have a work by Campbell, but this doesn't appear in the References list;in the Notes section you have a work by Gardiner & Grey, but this doesn't appear in the References list;Citations # 5 and 6 appear to be the same (Staff Vol 1 p. 11) and should be consolidated per WP:NAMEDREFS;Citations # 57 and 58 (Tarrant, p. 282) appear to be the same and should be consolidated as per above;Citations # 13 and 15 (Tarrant, p. 58) appear to be the same and should be consolidated as per above.AustralianRupert (talk) 09:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Thanks! I think I've fixed everything you pointed out here. Let me know if there's anything else that needs fixing. Parsecboy (talk) 12:07, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: all my concerns have been addressed. AustralianRupert (talk) 22:05, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per usual disclaimer. I would appreciate it if someone would check my copyediting. I've done Operation Albion and Battle of Jutland in many other articles, so I didn't look this time; I assume those subsections are fine. - Dank (push to talk) 14:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - another excellent article IMO. I made a couple of minor edits but overall it looks fine to me. Anotherclown (talk) 12:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support TomStar81 (Talk) 15:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.