Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Operation Postmaster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Promoted -MBK004 06:32, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator(s): Jim Sweeney (talk)
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because Operation Postmaster was a small almost unknown Special Operations Executive and British Commando operation. It has been through peer and GA reviews and I believe it is ready for an A Class review. Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments- no dab links, ext links all work, alt text is present (no action required);
- images appear appropriately licenced (no action required);
in the lead "Merchant vessel" I think should not be capitalised;in the lead, "audacious" sounds a little like a point of view, unless that is how it has been described;Citation # 3 "Chapell" is a typo, which should be "Chappell";Citation # 26 is a bare url and should be formatted (either with the {{cite web}} template or some other way of hiding the url chain) and including the title, publisher and accessdate;some of the works in the Bibliography don't have locations, if you can find them they should be added in (if you can't find them, that is okay and I won't hold it against the review).AustralianRupert (talk) 10:40, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply all done thanks for the review. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 11:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: all my concerns have been addressed. AustralianRupert (talk) 22:08, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Excellent article and close to FA class. My suggestions for further improvements are:
- It would be helpful to explain the Small Scale Raiding Force's role in greater detail
- I'm still surprised the large quantities of stuff which were listed as being carried by Duchessa d'Aosta - have you checked this against the source to see if it explains whether the cargo manifold was accurate? Nick-D (talk) 07:30, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes - It is what was supposed to be in the hold before the raid. There is nothing at all from after she was borrowed to say if it was accurate.--Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- succinct account of an interesting episode -- well done! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:05, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the support. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 18:28, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.