Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Operation Igloo White/Archive 1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
For your perusal. RM Gillespie 16:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I would like to see a few more citations to cover a couple places that are pretty bare. Specifically, the first paragraph of "Pinball Wizards" and the first two paragraphs of "Conclusion." Other than that, it looks good. Carom 17:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose In general well-written and well-cited, good flow. However:
- Needs a proofread. There are missing quotation marks, many broken citations that appear as question marks in the references section.
- Every book-scanned image is completely crooked. Look at the margins of the images compared to the margins of the surrounding boxes.
- Lacks depth. I was expecting a much more technical article with descriptions of the sensors, this is a nice overview but it left me wanting for more info. - Emt147 Burninate! 08:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose there are to many question marks in the reference section. When these question cites are replaed with cites that have meaningful information I will reconsider. TomStar81 (Talk) 19:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - I'm gonna have to go with oppose also for alot of the reasons that Emt147 listed, specifically the depth of the article and the images included in the article. It is a well organized and well written article, however it lacks detail and depth. The image issue is secondary, but better images would only enhance the article as a whole. Spot87 02:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.