Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Koli Point action
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Respectfully submit this article on a Pacific War battle for A-class review. Cla68 (talk) 07:36, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Cla68 comes through again with an excellent Pacific War battle article. As I said a short time ago about the Matanikau Offensive article, this article as well represents a good balance between focusing on the US/Allied and Japanese aspects of the conflict, and is written in an objective (NPOV) and professional manner. Keep up the good work. LordAmeth (talk) 22:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I am with his Lordship on this one. Well written, well done. Woody (talk) 13:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Nicely done. --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 17:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Small point: U.S. has points, CAF doesn't. Consistency? --ROGER DAVIES talk 18:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a good point. It needs to be consistent. Cla68 (talk) 23:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Its all been said. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:28, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Another great article. As a comment, I doubt that "U.S. Navy cruisers Helena, San Francisco, and destroyer Sterett bombarded Shōji's positions with cannon fire" - 'artillery fire' would be a better term (unless the ships used their 20mm automatic cannons in which case 'heavy machine gun fire' would possibly be the clearest term). --Nick Dowling (talk) 11:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.