Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Josef Wurmheller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted by Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator(s): MisterBee1966 (talk)

Josef Wurmheller (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another German World War II fighter pilot I am nominating this article for A-Class. It covers the major aspects of his life but it is a bit thin on his personal life which I am unable to address further. Nevertheless I think it might qualify for A-Class. Thanks in adavance for your feedback MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:02, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting. - Dank (push to talk)

  • "at least 18–20": Does this mean one source says 18 and another says 20? Which number seems more believable, and why? - Dank (push to talk) 02:02, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • "were four-engined bombers and 56 were against Supermarine Spitfire fighters.": were and were against are non-parallel; that is, if one of these fits grammatically in the sentence, then the other one doesn't.
  • "8 June 1944 ... 6 June 1944 ... 16 June 1944": It's better not to repeat the year when it's obvious.
  • Support on prose per standard disclaimer. These are my edits. - Dank (push to talk) 15:58, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support Comments: I did a little copy editing. Please check you are happy with my changes. I also have some comments/suggestions: AustralianRupert (talk) 12:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  • Copyedited so pls let me know if any issues, happy with prose otherwise.
  • Structure and level of detail seem fine.
  • Fully cited to what appear reliable references, and my quick source review revealed no obvious formatting errors (not sure I'd bother linking Osprey Publishing four times though, if at all since no other publishers are linked).
  • Image licensing looks okay; I suppose for context you could include a shot or two of the types of aircraft he flew but up to you.

Well done as usual, MB. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.