Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Isaac Komnenos (son of Alexios I)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

No consensus to promote at this time - Gog the Mild (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 18:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list[reply]

Isaac Komnenos (son of Alexios I)

Instructions for nominators and reviewers

Nominator(s): Cplakidas (talk)

Isaac was a colourful character: a younger prince who wanted to be emperor, but was always thwarted, forcing him into exile and wanderings across the Middle East. He passed on his ambition to his son, Andronikos I Komnenos, with fatal consequences for the Komnenian dynasty. The article was rewritten, practically from scratch, in 2018, and passed GA shortly after. I think it is as comprehensive as it can be, and would like to eventually nominate it for FA as well. Constantine ✍ 15:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Comments from Iazyges

Will take a look soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

but ultimately in vain reads somewhat awkward to me, suggest removing the but or changing to which was ultimately in vain
- Done.

During the struggle for John's succession in 1143 perhaps During the succession struggle that followed John's death in 1143
- Done.

In 1150, weakened by the onset of an illness, he was forced to retire from public life by Manuel in the interest of not having two of the three lede paragraphs start with "in [year]", perhaps Weakened by the onset of an illness, he was forced to retire from public life by Manuel in 1150.
- Done.

@Cplakidas: That's all I have; well done as always. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 03:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your time and the good suggestions, Iazyges! Constantine ✍ 16:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, happy to support. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WP:MILHIST coordinators: As this does not seem to attract much interest—admittedly its 'military' content is sparse—I would like to withdraw its nomination. Constantine ✍ 17:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Gog the Mild Constantine ✍ 17:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.