Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Heuschrecke 10/Archive 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have done a lot of fixing and expanding of the article in question, and I believe that it meets the criteria fully now. See these two previous versions: One and Two. The current version is this one. ~ Dreamy § 02:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- There are repeated instances of stand alone metric measurements in the article, is there any chance we could get standard measurements for those of us who are metrically challanged?
- In the first paragraph in the section "development" you have the phrase "on the chassis." Is there some particular reason why the word "on" is in italics?
- Is there some particular reason why the specification chart is in the middle of the article?
- There are no citations in the cancellation section. Were you unable to find any? TomStar81 (Talk) 06:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment As TomStar notes, the "cancellation" section is in need of some references. The "description" section could also use some citations. You may also want to consider expanding the lead some, but it's not really a major complaint at the moment. Carom (talk) 16:26, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Object lack of refs, and the "Fortune City" Source is not RS at all. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.