Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Ernest Titterton

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted by Zawed (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 10:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list[reply]

Ernest Titterton

Nominator(s): Hawkeye7 (talk)

Together with Mark Oliphant and Philip Baxter, he is one of the "Nuclear Knights" Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:55, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support by Finnusertop

Overall, an excellent biography about a fascinating person. Below are some comments, all of which are mere suggestions instead of "no-go" items.

Wikilink "diurnal variation" (but not to diurnal variation which seems to be about biology)
Y Linked to diurnal cycle Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know why you need two citations to cite the quotation: "nuclear power is the cheapest, cleanest and safest method of power production yet devised by man". If you really need to use "Nuclear Power and the Anti-Nuclear Movement: A Modern Social Problem", a page number and more metadata would be appreciated.
Y Added. There are actually two references, to a book and a paper. Split the two. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Ernie's erection" (quotation marks here, perhaps)
Y Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"During his career, Titterton received a plethora of awards", this sounds a little hyperbolic, and the sources you cite verify only the two most notable ones. A couple of other expressions ("of course, physics", "final report was scathing") are on the brink of being NPOV and OR, but I happen to think it's just good writing.
Y Deleted. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"if euthanasia were legal I should opt for it tomorrow", I tend to observe MOS:LWQ very closely; unless the person spoke or wrote in wikitext, wikilinks don't belong. Besides, euthanasia is a fairly common word.
Y I thought "diurnal" was. Unlinked. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:21, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review. Much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I support the promotion of this article to A-class status. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from AustralianRupert

Support: not a lot stood out to me. I have the following comments: AustralianRupert (talk) 14:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

this sentence is missing something: "His physics teacher, William Summerhayes, who cultivated Titterton's interest in science."
Y Deleted "who" Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
minor inconsistency in date presentation: "Retrieved August 29, 2016" v. "Retrieved 31 May 2017"
Y Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Brian Martin (1980). "Nuclear Knights". Rupert Public Interest Movement." Is this a book, or a website? If the former, it's format doesn't seem consistent with the other books.
Y Re-formatted to refer to the book. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
watch out for overlink: the duplicate link script reports quite a few examples in the article (although several seem to be false positives)
Y Unfortunately, the duplicate script seems to be broken; it no longer recognises the lead. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"File:Philip Chapman and Ernest Titterton.jpg": probably needs an adjustment to the date listed on the image description page to indicate when the image was actually taken
Y Removed image. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:38, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SupportComments by Peacemaker67

I reviewed this article at GAN and couldn't find much to comment on then. I have reviewed the changes since then, and just have a few comments:

his support for nuclear power in the lead is mentioned twice, suggest amalgamating it into one sentence
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think Queen Elizabeth's Grammar school should have a capital S for School, as it appears to be the formal name of the school
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
and entered to sixth form
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
leaving his father ~~was~~ unemployed
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
paid his tuition fees, ~~and~~ board and residence
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
£92 University scholarship, drop the capital U
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This met with a lukewarm
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
suggest linking PhD
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
suggest dropping the the in "at the Bikini Atoll"
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
how was it that Oliphant could offer him the job? Perhaps include what role Oliphant was in at the time?
Y Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
suggest introducing the ANU initialisation at first mention
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
SS Oracades has an errant a
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As a term in a foreign language, Bremsstrahlung really needs a part sentence describing what it is
Y Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
what is the EN tandem?
An electrostatic nuclear (EN) tandem accelerator Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
suggest "planning and conduct~~ing~~"
Done Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
the only query I have is whether sources (other than Waterford) have ever made comment on his involvement in the British nuclear tests
Y Oh sure. Added one by T. R. Ophel, author of A Tower of Strength: A History of the Department of Nuclear Physics, The Australian National University, 1950-1997 Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's me done. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image review by Anotherclown

Images all seem to be available under acceptable creative commons licences or have an appropriate fair use rationale (no action req'd as far as I can tell). Anotherclown (talk) 05:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.