Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Army of the Danube
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Promoted -MBK004 23:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator(s): Auntieruth55 (talk)
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because...it fills a gap in wiki-coverage of the War of the Second Coalition, especially in southwestern Germany in 1799. It's been in progress since the fall, and it has a sister article, Army of the Danube Order of Battle. The Army of the Danube article has been through the GA process, and since then I've pared it down slightly, because it is paired with the Order of Battle. I look forward to your continuing good humor and tolerance of my quirky citation style (which is consistent) and appreciate your constructive criticism. Auntieruth55 (talk) 17:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support No problems reported with dab links, external links or alt text. Well done! TomStar81 (Talk) 08:26, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: I fixed a couple of dash issues, however, it looks very good to me. I have a couple of minor points, but none of them pressing enough to keep me from supporting. They are as follows:
- the capitalisation of the titles in the Bibliography is inconsistent, I think they should be capitalised per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital_letters)#Composition titles
- I generally use the capitalization in the title page. I've changed it to meet the MOS. Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- there is a curly " in the Broda source in the Bibliography section, this should be straight per the MOS (I'd change it myself, but I'm uncertain if it is actually meant to be there or not, so can you please verify whether it should and "test and adjust" accordingly?)
- fixed.Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- in the main infobox, there is no country linked beside the flag icon, did you intend there to be, or are you leaving it blank for a reason? — AustralianRupert (talk) 11:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- isn't a country link repetitive? Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It just seems a little striking on the eye because in the other infoboxes you've linked the entity beside the flagicon, but its probably no big deal either way. — AustralianRupert (talk) 23:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- but it says French Directory immediately below it, which would make it redundant. If I remove FD from the allegiance line, will it make more sense? Auntieruth55 (talk) 00:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks good to me. — AustralianRupert (talk) 20:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- but it says French Directory immediately below it, which would make it redundant. If I remove FD from the allegiance line, will it make more sense? Auntieruth55 (talk) 00:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It just seems a little striking on the eye because in the other infoboxes you've linked the entity beside the flagicon, but its probably no big deal either way. — AustralianRupert (talk) 23:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- isn't a country link repetitive? Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support
- What's a Feldzeug Marshal?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- General of Infantry. I'll add it in parens. Auntieruth55 (talk) 18:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.