Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Actions along the Matanikau
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Respectfully submit this article for A-class consideration. Cla68 00:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Oppose I think it is a great article, but it needs better sourcing. With more refrences, it could be an A-Class, but for now, no. --Pupster21 19:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagree with objection. This article extensively utilizes five main sources as well as referencing three other sources for several citations. Based on my experience with editing and reviewing articles, eight sources are more than adequate. Cla68 01:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment They need to be linked to the early paras with footnotes if you want to cover them twice! --Pupster21 12:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What exactly do you mean? I can't make heads or tails of that comment. Kirill Lokshin 12:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How am I supposed to know??? ...--Pupster21 19:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok tails. You happy??? --Pupster21 19:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How am I supposed to know??? ...--Pupster21 19:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- What exactly do you mean? I can't make heads or tails of that comment. Kirill Lokshin 12:25, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment They need to be linked to the early paras with footnotes if you want to cover them twice! --Pupster21 12:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagree with objection. This article extensively utilizes five main sources as well as referencing three other sources for several citations. Based on my experience with editing and reviewing articles, eight sources are more than adequate. Cla68 01:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Carom 19:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Sorry, I wasn't thinking straight. I was sick. It's a fine article. Gloomy name though. --Pupster21 12:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Suppport. Great as usual.--Yannismarou 13:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.