Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/U.S. Route 16 in Michigan
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
U.S. Route 16 in Michigan
[edit]Toolbox |
---|
U.S. Route 16 in Michigan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
- Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
- Nominator's comments: Grand River Avenue dates back to before Michigan's territorial days, and after I replaced one source, I feel this merits review for A-Class.
- Nominated by: Imzadi 1979 → 04:43, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- First comment occurred: 04:46, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Review by Dough4872
[edit]Review by Dough4872
|
---|
Comments:
|
- Support - Issues resolved. Dough4872 01:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Review / Image review by Admrboltz
[edit]Extended content
|
---|
I will do a prose check later this weekend. --AdmrBoltz 18:33, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Additional comments from me.
Otherwise the article looks good to go to me. --AdmrBoltz 22:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
|
- Support --AdmrBoltz 21:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- One afterthought. If the highway was in service until 1962, why not use the 1961 US Route shields, or did MSHD not place the new signs on the road before decommissioning it? --AdmrBoltz 06:37, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- As far as we can tell, the MSHD never adopted the 1961 specs and retained the 1948s until the 1971/73 update. Imzadi 1979 → 08:21, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- One afterthought. If the highway was in service until 1962, why not use the 1961 US Route shields, or did MSHD not place the new signs on the road before decommissioning it? --AdmrBoltz 06:37, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Review by Rschen7754
|
---|
I will do review number 3. --Rschen7754 04:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Should be a support after these issues are fixed. --Rschen7754 08:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
|
- Support issues resolved, but noting the few comments above for a future FAC. --Rschen7754 16:03, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Spotcheck by TCN7JM
[edit]I will do the spotcheck. TCN7JM 09:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
I will be checking 15 sources, the citation numbers are accurate as of this revision. TCN7JM 04:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Source 2 Good on V and P
- Source 3 Good on V and P
- Source 12 Good on V and P
- Source 13 Good on V and P
- Source 14 Good on V and P
- Source 15 Good on V and P
- Source 16 Good on V and P
- Source 17 Good on V and P
- Source 23 Good on V and P
- Source 26 Good on V and P
- Source 27 Good on V and P
- Source 33 Good on V and P
- Source 50 Good on V and P
- Source 51 Good on V and P
- Source 52 Good on V and P
Well, well, well. Flawless. I've no choice but to support. Great job. TCN7JM 04:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Promoted - Another fine piece for Michigan! - Floydian τ ¢ 05:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.