Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive
Appearance
Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Toolbox |
---|
Pierce Stocking Scenic Drive (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
- Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
- Nominator's comments: Unlike other recent nominations, I don't intend for this to head to FAC for a while. It's an interesting drive to take, and I think it's worthy of polishing up to the A-Class level. As for FAC, I have bigger fish for now.
- Nominated by: Imzadi 1979 → 09:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- First comment occurred: 21:02, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Resolved issues from Dough4872 03:08, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Comments by Dough4872
I have some concerns with the article before I can support it for A-class:
- Is it possible for major points of interest and termini to be listed in the infobox?
- Are there any traffic counts from more recently than 2008?
- "The road was originally known as the Sleeping Bear Dunes Park when he first opened it to the public in 1967.", is there a title that goes after "Sleeping Bear Dunes Park" such as road?
- why is "4.11 m" in brackets and not parentheses? Dough4872 21:01, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
- Will do.
- Not from any press sources. The NPS doesn't log traffic counts on this road like MDOT does with its state highways.
- Nope, that is the full, complete and total name, "Sleeping Bear Dunes Park".
- The conversion is an addition to the quote, and like any added content in a quotation, it's in brackets. Imzadi 1979 → 02:13, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support - Nice article. Dough4872 03:08, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Review by Rschen7754 |
---|
I plan to review this article. --Rschen7754 23:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
|
- Support issues resolved. --Rschen7754 00:13, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Image check by Fredddie
|
---|
|
- Support. No issues to fix with regards to the images. –Fredddie™ 01:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Review by TCN7JM
|
---|
Comments from TCN7JM
--TCN7JM 02:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
|
- Support; my issues have been resolved. –TCN7JM 02:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.