Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Pennsylvania Route 652
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pennsylvania Route 652
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| Toolbox |
|---|
Pennsylvania Route 652 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
- Suggestion: Demote from A-Class
- Nominator's comments: Previous review: Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment/A-Class review/Pennsylvania Route 652
Like Interstate 37, this is entirely sourced to either the NBI or maps, which is fine for GA, but fails "comprehensive" for the FA criteria. If it would not have a chance of passing at FA (as it failed in 2009), it should not remain A-Class, unless substantial work is done.
- Nominated by: Rschen7754 10:55, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- First comment occurred:
- Don't even bother asking for consensus, go right ahead. Mitch32(It is very likely this guy doesn't have a girlfriend.) 15:27, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- We can work as a project to keep this at A-class rather than demoting it. Dough4872 17:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry, but I'm not completely sure it's worth it. All the sources are maps/National Bridge Inventory, and we've already got two other articles at ACR looking for collaboration, both of which are more important than this article simply because of the roads they're about. This can stay at GA, but it definitely doesn't meet the A-Class criteria, and it will take way too much digging through news sources to keep it where it is. TCN7JM 18:28, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- We can work as a project to keep this at A-class rather than demoting it. Dough4872 17:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Officially voting Demote as it will need a complete resourcing of the history, unfortunately. No problems with it staying GA. --Rschen7754 20:11, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Demote If someone wants to work on this article to bring it up to the higher-than-they-used-to-be A-Class standards, they are welcome to, but it will be assessed with a new A-Class Review. VC 21:28, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I, too, think this should be demoted. It's not that there are issues with the article, it's just that there isn't enough for it to be A-Class. It should remain a GA. TCN7JM 21:31, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.