Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Mitchell Freeway
Mitchell Freeway
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Toolbox |
---|
Mitchell Freeway (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
- Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
- Nominator's comments: This is Oceania's and Australia's first GA class article, and now it will be the first road article from outside North America to go to A-Class review. Please note that the article currently uses
{{Infobox Australian road}}
instead of{{Infobox road}}
. While I am not against the use of{{Infobox road}}
as a concept, the template requires further work to customise it for Australian roads, and I'd rather not bring up the issue here considering what happened last time it was raised. As far as I am aware,{{Infobox Australian road}}
is compliant with the MOS.
- Nominated by: Evad37 (talk) 15:28, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- First comment occurred: 16:00, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Review by Dough4872
[edit]Review by Dough4872
|
---|
Comments:
Thanks for reviewing the article. I have made changes to fix all the issues above. - Evad37 (talk) 03:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support - My concerns have been addressed. Dough4872 15:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Review by Fredddie
[edit]Review by Fredddie
|
---|
First off, I'd like to welcome you to ACR. If you're not aware, I like to divide up my reviews the same way the article is split. I'll then go over each line and make sure the prose is tight. Sometimes I will just have a question that may or may not inspire you to clarify something written. I'll post the whole thing once I'm done. –Fredddie™ 03:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support. Looks good. –Fredddie™ 18:57, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Image review by Rschen7754
[edit]I'm trying not to review every article that comes through here, so I'll just do an image review for now. If needed I'll pick up the third review, but I'll see if someone gets it.
- File:Mitchell Freeway map.png - CC-BY-SA 3.0, sources noted
- File:Mkt st to mill pt gnangarra.ogg - Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia - looking at the license page I don't see any issues.
- File:Mitchell Freeway Perth city ramps.png - CC-BY-SA 3.0, sources noted
- File:Mitchell Freeway 112 N Gwelup Karrinyup Rd.jpg - CC-BY-SA 3.0
- File:Mitchell Freeway 286 S Joondalup Moore.jpg - CC-BY-SA 3.0
- File:Narrows Interchange under construction.jpg - CC-BY-SA 3.0
- File:Mitchell Freeway 147 N Walter morning peak.jpg - CC-BY-SA 3.0
- File:MitchellFreewayExtMooreDriveMay07.jpg - PD
Review done, no issues found. --Rschen7754 07:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Review by Nbound
[edit]Review by Nbound
|
---|
|
Support - The few issues not addressed in earlier reviews have been addressed. Consider the addition of the extension map a comment or potential guidance for even further improvement. -- Nbound (talk) 11:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spotcheck by Rschen7754 |
---|
Making a drive-by comment - the citation for the length of the road really should go in the infobox, not in the lead. While there's nothing specifically prohibiting citations in the lead, they're typically frowned upon when the lead summarizes information found elsewhere in the article. --Rschen7754 09:47, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the last paragraph of 1.2 is a bit long - can it be broken up? --Rschen7754 09:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
After some discussion I've agreed to take up the spotcheck (hopefully I'll have it up today or tomorrow). How these work is we pick 25% of the sources (with a 20 source limit), to check for verifiability and plagiarism. If sources are not online, we ask for any electronic copies over email; if they are not available that way (it's a book, for example) that's fine. It seems that most of your sources are electronic though. After the spotcheck is done the article will be promoted. Reference formatting isn't my strength, but I know enough so that whatever issues are left should be easily fixable at FAC. General formatting notes:
|
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.