Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Brambleberry of RiverClan
 | This recruitment has ended and is now archived. Please do not edit the contents of this page. |
Status: Abandoned
Date Started: July 21, 2013
Date Ended: May 7, 2014
Recruiter: Ed!
I'd be glad to help mentor you in the Good Article process. Just to get started, let me know what kinds of articles you'd like to start reviewing and if you have any questions about the WP:GA process, and we can get started from there. —Ed!(talk) 17:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- I feel like I understand the GA process pretty well. I would like to start by reviewing pop culture articles (specifically TV, literature, and sports), and then I'd move on to biology and history. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 22:24, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
- Not a problem. OK, I'll start off first reviewing a pop culture article (They're pretty easy to do) and then we can move into something biology or history related, since that tends to be more complex. You can follow along and ask questions where you have them. That work? —Ed!(talk) 00:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yup, that works! öBrambleberry of RiverClan 14:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hey. Very sorry for the delay, the past few months have been frantic. Are you still interested? —Ed!(talk) 01:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I am still very much interested. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 14:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Hey. Very sorry for the delay, the past few months have been frantic. Are you still interested? —Ed!(talk) 01:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yup, that works! öBrambleberry of RiverClan 14:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Not a problem. OK, I'll start off first reviewing a pop culture article (They're pretty easy to do) and then we can move into something biology or history related, since that tends to be more complex. You can follow along and ask questions where you have them. That work? —Ed!(talk) 00:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Reviews by Ed!
[edit]I highly recommend Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not, since a lot of times people aren't clear on what is, and is not, a good article. This is particularly true among experienced reviewers. You'll find a lot of things are easier or more open to interpretation than you may be thinking they are. A key point is, make sure you're not treating articles to a different standard than that. Some articles will easily go above GA, while others don't. 17:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC)