Wikipedia:WikiProject Chess/Review/Ashot Nadanian
Review of Ashot Nadanian
[edit]This review is done in the scope of the WikiProject Chess and is transcluded from Wikipedia:WikiProject Chess/Review/Ashot Nadanian. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
I would like to nominate Judit Polgár and Ashot Nadanian articles for A-class. I believe they are good enough. What do you think? --MrsHudson (talk) 21:00, 20 October 2010 (UTC) |
Review by SunCreator[edit] |
---|
Possible. For Judit Polgár the Illustrative games section is unreferenced. For Ashot Nadanian the notable games is poorly referenced and there is no reason to believe they are 'notable' as such. Also why is the Washington Post excerpt not a WP:COPYVIO. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 13:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
|
Support A class. The article is very informative, well structured and fully sourced. -- Yegishe (talk) 14:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC) |
|
Support. I have contributed a bit to the article. It has had an amazing improvement thanks to MrsHudson. After the copyediting by SyG, there seems to be little left to change. I Do Care (talk) 11:48, 12 January 2011 (UTC) |
All remarks and concerns expressed by the reviewers have been dealt with appropriately. More than three approvals have been gathered (Yegishe, SyG, I Do Care). So I shall close this review and pass the article to A-class. SyG (talk) 14:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC) |