Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Peer review/Hubert Latham

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of this peer review was that the article assessment remained unchanged. --Born2flie (talk) 13:37, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hubert Latham

This is a new article needing a general review to be classified. Any advice to expand the article or improve the references would be appreciated. Respectfully, SamBlob (talk) 23:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Born2flie

airplane/aeroplane

Disjointed use of airplane/aeroplane. Arguments abound within WP:AIR (not to mention Wikipedia) as to whether either should be used or not, but for this article, at the very least, one or the other should be used and not both. --Born2flie (talk) 08:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

exploits

Ballooning is an aviation activity. I'd recommend combining all the exploits into one section regardless of whether they are aviation or not, and lose the subsection headings because they drown a short article in headings and point out how short it really is. --Born2flie (talk) 08:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor MacInnis

needs an infobox
exploits seems like a strange term, try using standard headers, "Early life", etc.
The intro paragraph is supposed to be a summary of the following sections, not bigger. Until the article is of sufficient size, move the information to the main body of the article.

- Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 14:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.