Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/October 2013 Backlog Elimination Drive/SarahStierch

1. [1]

    Pass - Yes there's no reference Pratyya Ghosh
   

2. [2]

    Pass - Great- huge list of primary refs Rankersbo
   

3. talk:Articles for creation/European Society of Authors

    Pass - Rankersbo
   

4. [3]

    Pass - Good job Pratyya Ghosh
   

5. [4]
6. [5]

    Pass - No problem Pratyya Ghosh
   

7. [6]
8. [7]
9. [8]

    Pass - Agreed. References are not independent. Anne Delong
   

10. [9]
11. [10]
12. [11]
13. [12]
14. [13]
15. [14]
16. [15]

     Pass - no sources 78.26
    

17. [16]
18. [17]

     Pass - at least two reliable, independent sources with substantial coverage of subject 78.26
    

19. [18]
20. [19]

     Pass - sources not independent 78.26
    

21. [20]
22. [21]

     Pass - self-published sources only> 78.26
    

23. [22]
24. [23]
25. [24]
26. [25]
27. [26]
28. [27]
29. [28]
30. [29]
31. [30]
32. [31]

     Pass - Rankersbo
    

33. [32]

Checked reviews

1. GHS (General HydroStatics)

    Pass - Article was correctly marked as copyright violation Zach Vega
   

2. Justin Smith (radio)

    Pass - The article looks pretty good. Zach Vega
   

3. Boston Children's Chorus

    Pass - Good job! The article was clearly ready to go, albeit it had some errors. Zach Vega
   

4. Syed Zahur Ahmad

    Pass - Yep, it needed some secondary sources. Zach Vega
   

5. Cathy Luchetti

    Pass - Davidwr