Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 March 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 7 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 9 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 8

[edit]

00:22:17, 8 March 2022 review of submission by Yojana Mohata

[edit]

I submitted my draft but was declined. So can you help me with what changes do I have to make or what is the problem which is happening?

Yojana Mohata (talk) 00:22, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link. @Yojana Mohata: your draft was declined because most of the references are not reliable. Twitter, Youtube, and Wikipedia usually shouldn't be used as sources, and most of the rest of the citations are primary sources. Please remove those references and replace them with things such as in-depth news articles on the topic. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 00:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yojana Mohata: Independent media sources like this one are better. If you can find several more good independent ones and use them to source all of the article content, you might have a chance. Please read WP:COI just in case you are connected to the subject. TechnoTalk (talk) 00:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

00:39:24, 8 March 2022 review of submission by FearGame

[edit]


FearGame (talk) 00:39, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Im going to make it opinion-less and less promotional. Also, Im including many more links to make it notable.

Does anything in particular bother you?

Draft deleted and user permanently blocked for advertising. TechnoTalk (talk) 23:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

00:44:05, 8 March 2022 review of submission by Tyscutist18

[edit]

The organization is known for its services and reference links are proving the same. The idea or intention of this information will not bring business to the organization, instead, prove the existence of the organization. There is no intention of advertisement there, in the article was written with the existing page on Wikipedia. Tyscutist18 (talk) 00:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tyscutist18 Wikipedia is not for documenting the mere existence of an organization, that is considered promotional here. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about an organization, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable organization. 331dot (talk) 01:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for explaining. How do I go about it? Can you guide me? Tyscutist18 (talk) 10:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tyscutist18 First, if you are associated with this organization, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID for information on required formal disclosures.(being an employee counts as being paid even if you have not been specifically paid or asked to edit). If you are associated with this organization, I advise you against proceeding; in my experience organization representatives are far too close to their organization to be able to edit about their organization as Wikipedia requires. The best indicator that a company meets the definition of a notable company is if independent editors take note of the company's coverage in independent reliable sources and choose on their own to write about it. Trying to force the issue does not often work.
If you still want to proceed, please read Your First Article as well as the definition of a notable organization to see if your company meets it. Then- while setting aside everything you know about the organization and all materials put out by the it- gather at least three independent reliable sources with significant coverage of your company, that was not prompted by the organization or based on information fed by the organization(such as press releases, interviews with staff, announcements of routine activities). Any article about your organization must summarize these sources. If you wish to find out before attempting to write about the organization, you can put your three best independent reliable sources here and we can tell you if they actually establish that your organization is notable. 331dot (talk) 10:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tyscutist18 I did a simple Google search and don't see any media coverage about Nitin Shashindran or QUAFF. You'll have a hard time getting an article approved if the subject doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. TechnoTalk (talk) 00:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

03:01:44, 8 March 2022 review of submission by DingoPuppy3

[edit]

Because of her many contributions to the writing culture of America, Bernadette Baran is significant. This article is being added simply to enhance the database of Wikipedia and not for personal or advertisement purposes. The nature of this article directly aligns with the spirit of Wikipedia. Please reconsider adding this so as to educate the people. Thank you for your time. DingoPuppy3 (talk) 03:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DingoPuppy3 Your draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. You offer nothing other than her personal website. A Wikipedia article summarizes what independent reliable sources state about a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person or a notable creative professional. If you just want to tell the world about her, you should use social media or a website with less stringent requirements where that is permitted. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

04:32:04, 8 March 2022 review of submission by Mapotakes API

[edit]


Mapotakes API (talk) 04:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mapotakes API: This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. This would be a textbook no-context deletion were it in mainspace. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 06:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:55:04, 8 March 2022 review of draft by 151.48.199.65

[edit]


I need a help about the text and also the quotes and I'd like understand what's the problem. I reduced the text to the minimum, to be as neutral as possible but it's not okay yet. I followed your guide lines about the quotes too, but the way I did it's not the right one.

151.48.199.65 (talk) 16:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the draft sources are papers the subject wrote himself. Wikipedia is more interested in what others have written about him. If nobody has written about him, then it's hard for the subject to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. See WP:GNG for more info. TechnoTalk (talk) 23:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:55:01, 8 March 2022 review of submission by GregorSun

[edit]

- How many resources Do I need and what are reliable soureces? I have a minium of 10 different companies/research institutes which refer to CAN XL? - I rewrote the article that to be more neutral. Would else could I improve? GregorSun (talk) 20:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GregorSun: This is way too much technical detail for an article. It reads like a data sheet. I recommend instead you take a few highlights about CAN XL and add them to CAN FD#CAN XL. "CAN XL" can then be redirected there. If others see fit to expand the info, perhaps eventually a CAN XL fork can be created. Start small. Also, you should take a look at CAN FD to see how to properly format section titles and where to add sources. There's no right or wrong number of sources, as long as everything you add is sourced with independent coverage. Right now, your draft has too much written by the organization promoting the technology. TechnoTalk (talk) 23:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_March_8&oldid=1077188707"